Being in over my head in this muzzleloading culture, a veritable greenhorn, there are no miraculous revelations in my comments. But comment I must because the culture and the NMLRA are important to me.
For perspective: I am a Life/Endowment/Benefactor member of the NRA. Why? Most every competition I enjoy with suppository guns can be done best under the auspices of the CMP. In fact, the NRA is more often an antagonist of its competitors than a booster. But the NRA is the absolute most important and effective champion of the second amendment and the best promoter of the gun-owner's way of life, period. I support that.
I am a Golden Guardian member of the NMLRA and paying my way to be One of One Thousand. Why? I've never fired a single shot of muzzleloading competition in my life! It is because the NMLRA is the most important entity attempting to preserve the very historic and cultural roots of our gun-owning way of life.
Could the NMLRA do a better job? Probably. Most human endeavors are subject to improvement. As a newcomer I appreciate hearing the criticisms posted above because we have to know the sticking points and work to get past them. I am particularly impressed that some of the posters started out expressing mostly animosity but stayed in the conversation and made important observations. Thank you for your contribution!
Now one point of contention is whether it is the NMLRA or some of its outstanding members that are actually doing the promoting and preserving. It's a bit of a 'chicken or the egg' conundrum. But in light of the many excellent volunteers who are choosing to do their good work under the banner of the NMLRA I think it is fair to give credit to the NMLRA. It provides the continuity and nexus to the many personal contributions.
I think it is essential to the preservation of our second amendment rights to have a national level organization that can promote the historical depth, the wealth of traditions and skills and artistry of firearms without the off-putting distractions of Modern Sporting Rifles, concealed carry, and etc.
To some extent our modern society recognizes that it has become a hectic, disposable, short-sighted, plastic culture. The NMLRA represents alternatives to that on many levels - all of them ultimately leading back to firearms, our fight for freedom, etc. It is a critical component of our fight to preserve our rights and culture that we have the muzzleloading culture available as an alternative voice. It can satisfy the need to be creative - mechanically and artistically. It can satisfy the need to understand our place in history and provide a connection to the American saga. It is a crucial bypass on the road to keeping our second amendment rights understandable to the broad public.
In that light, every competitor - or casual shooter, every reenactor, is an ambassador to the public. You can't avoid that when you're making noise, smoke and fire and dressing funny! It draws observers and holds them with the novelty. It creates a new avenue to attempt to acquaint the public with the firearms culture in an, intriguing, non-threatening manner.
In my eyes, the NMLRA is the most important force in this second front of the battle to preserve our rights and culture. And that - in and of itself - is plenty of reason to pay $35 per year, even if you get nothing else at all!
But it's not really the reason any of us join in the first place, so it is fair to question how well the association is serving the individual interests of its membership.
It can't be all about Friendship, but Friendship is not unimportant. Yes, it is not convenient to all of the membership, but it is relatively near to a large part of our population and especially to the areas where our culture evolved. And, as someone pointed out above, it has to be somewhere! NMLRA would really be adrift in the wind without the nexus of Friendship.
But is Friendship the best focus of the organization's mission? No. It is home, but it is not the mission. The mission is everywhere else, wherever the muzzleloading sport and culture can be put before new prospects, new audiences. Making our competitions and other activities accessible and inviting to as many likely prospects as possible is what is crucial.
Local clubs are crucial. Understandable rules and competitions are crucial. Safe, well-run activities are crucial. Recognizing, supporting and encouraging those who show an interest is crucial. This is what must be emphasized and where our time and funds must be focused.
And then, coming all the way back to page one, post one, there is that issue...
The [expletive deleted] are a very valid pool of prospects. The fact that they show up at competitions puts them miles ahead of other prospects. Yes, their current firearm of choice (or chance?) was designed as a cheap and dumbed-down way of exploiting primitive hunting seasons, but they have shown up to compete!
Throughout the shooting sports universe there is a continuum of involvement. The low end of this continuum is the road sign shooters followed by the tacticool idiots who just want to see how fast they can unload their high capacity magazines. A little higher up is the class of hunters who have very little interest in the tool they use. Moving on you get the shooters - hunters or not - who are enthusiasts at some level. Those willing to put in the effort to show up at competitions are already way up towards the other end of the continuum! The fact that they have shown up with the lowest common denominator firearm should not condemn them, it may be the only even vaguely appropriate firearm they have or can afford at this time. But it has brought them to us so we can infect them with our enthusiasm for the traditional firearms we love. Hallelujah!
Don't chase these prospects away, you've already got them all the way to showing up at competitions! Have faith! Show them your flintlock and encourage them to try it out! They will want one! And they will want to shoot it in competition because they are already doing that! Do you see any more likely prospects?