when all is said and done and you said a lot that guy is right and I rather shoot with him and that wild woman then some psychologicalCritical thinking and analysis of a situation is inconsistent with projecting onto those who offer other opinions assumptions that those folks are 'petrified' , shooting '12 gr charges', applying 'secret lube' over the chambers , use a 'wooden dowel' to seat their balls, wear a 'welding glove' while shooting and focus their shooing on a hope that a 'dreaded chain fire doesn't occur with every shot. And, to the shame of PC revolver shooters everywhere - the wear eye protection. That is, IMHO, a tremendous indulgence in gratuitous insults of folks on this thread who are, from what I can tell from their posts, sensible, mature, avid BP shooters and I suspect their degree of care also produces very small groups on the range.
But that's not the end of it. The projections extend in equal measure to the heroic, bad-ass shooter: 'Marlboro light dangling from her mouth" (could be a joint for all you know, and ,Clint Eastwood lighting of dynamite with his cheroot was A MOVIE ), "no eye pro" ( how is this to be admired?) , 'probably capping on max loads of whatever they could mash into the chambers and whatever caps the bought at a sporting goods store" ( again, absolutely no basis for this 'probability', and ascribes to this person or her accomplice 1) the most likely cause of the chain fire and 2) the most irresponsible lack of knowledge about the weapon and the use thereof ) and , to complete the imaginary projections onto this duo ( who, as best I could tell from the video, couldn't hit the broad side of a barn) 'they probably reloaded it and kept shooting afterward' - what is the basis for this "probably " of action which any responsible firearm owner would consider irresponsible to the point of recklessness?
Maybe there are more folks on this forum than might be expected who 'cap on max loads of whatever they can mash into the chamber' , but that approach to use of a deadly weapon, to the derision of those who extol reasonable regard for safety of themselves and others nearby, is EXACTLY why the Darwin Awards were created. To see this mentality surface in conjunction with their projections onto a gal in a tank top is....sad.
"intellect"
.
