I was reading a bit of "Little House on the Prairie", and Ms. Wilder wrote of her father keeping a long rifle (we may never know what it looked like) over the chinked fireplace, hung on two green sticks jabbed into the log wall, and how he loaded it afresh each night with round ball and a cap. This was in 1870, and I'm wondering if it was an odd duck of the era.
The Wilders were dirt poor, so it stands to reason that they would use whatever gun they could afford. The gun therein may have been a very old re-locked gun, but we will never know. This makes me wonder about the realities of the entire American firearms industry at the time. (I have my FFL now, and only now do I realize how much of a grey area this part of the industry's history is.)
The mid 1870s into the current day are so well documented with definite models and calibers and blueprints. All very standardized. It also seems to be the case for the colonial era of the Americas until right about 1850, when my education of the whole industry is greyed out.
So here are some questions;
1 - if I were to walk into a hardware store during the year 1870, what would I see for sale? I'm guessing that the trade musket and generic composite cobbled muskets in caplock were the best selling, with single shot pistols being there as well, but with revolvers being very costly indeed. I know the US gov. wasn't selling convertible muskets as surplus just yet.
2 - were breechloaders common at all around 1870? Seems brass shot shells were to be has in 100 hull boxes, but whether anyone could afford them is a mystery to me. What time frame detailed the death of the commercial muzzleloader heyday? According to Sears catalogs ca.1890, muzzies are absent, or otherwise listed as true antiques. I know Colt, the goverment and most rifles were totally metallic feeding by 1875.
3 - where double barrels as common as the US farmer stereotype would lead us to believe? According to Sears, the generic Belgian double was the king of the trade ca.1890, but doubles may have been a luxury of the steam powered machinery of the time and not to be had only 20 year prior. I'm not sure at all.
4 - and finally; at what point in time did rifles come to par with smoothbore sales (I suspect around 1930, but this too is based on catalogue offerings)? I know this is a real wild card question, and we may never really know.
The Wilders were dirt poor, so it stands to reason that they would use whatever gun they could afford. The gun therein may have been a very old re-locked gun, but we will never know. This makes me wonder about the realities of the entire American firearms industry at the time. (I have my FFL now, and only now do I realize how much of a grey area this part of the industry's history is.)
The mid 1870s into the current day are so well documented with definite models and calibers and blueprints. All very standardized. It also seems to be the case for the colonial era of the Americas until right about 1850, when my education of the whole industry is greyed out.
So here are some questions;
1 - if I were to walk into a hardware store during the year 1870, what would I see for sale? I'm guessing that the trade musket and generic composite cobbled muskets in caplock were the best selling, with single shot pistols being there as well, but with revolvers being very costly indeed. I know the US gov. wasn't selling convertible muskets as surplus just yet.
2 - were breechloaders common at all around 1870? Seems brass shot shells were to be has in 100 hull boxes, but whether anyone could afford them is a mystery to me. What time frame detailed the death of the commercial muzzleloader heyday? According to Sears catalogs ca.1890, muzzies are absent, or otherwise listed as true antiques. I know Colt, the goverment and most rifles were totally metallic feeding by 1875.
3 - where double barrels as common as the US farmer stereotype would lead us to believe? According to Sears, the generic Belgian double was the king of the trade ca.1890, but doubles may have been a luxury of the steam powered machinery of the time and not to be had only 20 year prior. I'm not sure at all.
4 - and finally; at what point in time did rifles come to par with smoothbore sales (I suspect around 1930, but this too is based on catalogue offerings)? I know this is a real wild card question, and we may never really know.