short version: Muzzleloader
Much to my shame, I managed to let my subscription to Muzzleloader lapse and i've yet to renew it (although it is on my 'punch list'). What appeals to me about Muzzleloader (as opposed to Muzzle Blasts) is that the former does not print a bunch of stuff about in- lines, plastic stocks, and a bunch of rifles that claim to be muzzle loaders, but really try to look like a Remington 700 bred to an AR-15.
(WARNING-TIRADE FOLLOWS)
if it doesn't have a side lock, or isn't an underhammer, it's not really a muzzle loader, and I don't really care if the projectile and propellant are separate, together, go in from the back, the front, the side or whatever ... I don't care is Scotty beams them into the chamber by way of the transporter ...
no sidelock: no muzzleloader status ... simple?
any questions? fine- -keep 'em to yourself.
now if you want to shoot one of 'those things,' I suppose that you have a right to do so. you have a right to smear dog poo in your hair, too.
what you don't have is a right or any standing to expect me to participate in your odious behavior.
(OK - it's safe to come out now, the tirade is over and the danger has passed)
Muzzle Blasts, however, is connected to the NMLRA, which does a great deal for the ML community, and I would support it even without the magazine ... I do miss the Bevel Brothers.
make good smoke!