• This community needs YOUR help today. We rely 100% on Supporting Memberships to fund our efforts. With the ever increasing fees of everything, we need help. We need more Supporting Members, today. Please invest back into this community. I will ship a few decals too in addition to all the account perks you get.



    Sign up here: https://www.muzzleloadingforum.com/account/upgrades
  • Friends, our 2nd Amendment rights are always under attack and the NRA has been a constant for decades in helping fight that fight.

    We have partnered with the NRA to offer you a discount on membership and Muzzleloading Forum gets a small percentage too of each membership, so you are supporting both the NRA and us.

    Use this link to sign up please; https://membership.nra.org/recruiters/join/XR045103

CANNON QUESTION

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Doc Ivory

45 Cal.
Joined
Jun 7, 2020
Messages
755
Reaction score
416
Location
Naples, Florida
Its my understanding (rookie at best) that cannon barrels weren't rifled till about mid American civil war.
Is that true? I would have thought someone, somewhere would have tinkered with rifling a barrel when rifling for pistols
and shoulder arms became more the norm.

Perhaps, it was commercial contracts for rifled cannon barrels didn't arrive till th3e mid civil war.

Thanks gents,

-Doc
 
Its my understanding (rookie at best) that cannon barrels weren't rifled till about mid American civil war.
Is that true? I would have thought someone, somewhere would have tinkered with rifling a barrel when rifling for pistols
and shoulder arms became more the norm.

Perhaps, it was commercial contracts for rifled cannon barrels didn't arrive till th3e mid civil war.

Thanks gents,

-Doc
Disclaimer, I don't know anything about cannons, but wonder if using steel/iron balls would be the reason for not rifling a cannon. Lead will deform relatively easily, therefore allowing it to track in the rifling grooves.
 
I guess one could look at rifles of the time as an example. Muskets were faster to load than rifles. Bullets vs round balls didn't come into play much before the civil war. So the advent of an elongated
projectile that requires a rifled bore to stabilize probably was the answer.
 
Its my understanding (rookie at best) that cannon barrels weren't rifled till about mid American civil war.
Is that true? I would have thought someone, somewhere would have tinkered with rifling a barrel when rifling for pistols
and shoulder arms became more the norm.

Perhaps, it was commercial contracts for rifled cannon barrels didn't arrive till th3e mid civil war.

Thanks gents,

-Doc
 
Only when they developed copper or lead rings, sabots, incorporated onto a pointed shell did they start rifiling artillery
 
Another amateur here, but I would expect rifled artillery really gained traction alongside the implementation of breechloaders. You guys know how difficult it can be engraving rifling into a little rifle ball in some cases, right? Imagine the force required to engrave an artillery projectile if loading from the muzzle!
 
Loading speed was often the deciding factor in cannon warfare. Projectiles were made of iron and sometimes stone. Loading something like that could be near impossible. I sold my copy of 'Round shot and Rammers' to someone here. I'll betcha it discusses this subject.
 
Back
Top