what's wrong here?

Discussion in 'General Muzzleloading' started by Rifleman1776, Jan 20, 2020.

Help Support Muzzle Loading Forum by donating:

  1. Jan 21, 2020 #21

    Baxter

    Baxter

    Baxter

    54 Cal. MLF Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2012
    Messages:
    2,431
    Likes Received:
    224
    Location:
    Northern MN.
    I don't understand this statement; please explain why it might be a double. TIA.
     
  2. Jan 21, 2020 #22

    SDSmlf

    SDSmlf

    SDSmlf

    40 Cal.

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2006
    Messages:
    1,421
    Likes Received:
    609
    Location:
    Western North Carolina
    Would explain the score of 56, but I am not familiar with six shot match rules.
     
  3. Jan 21, 2020 #23

    Grenadier1758

    Grenadier1758

    Grenadier1758

    58 Cal.

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2004
    Messages:
    4,120
    Likes Received:
    921
    Location:
    St. Louis, MO
    The hole at the 10 o'clock position in the 10 ring appears slightly larger than the other holes.

    The scorers at my gun club always mark each hole with the score.
     
  4. Jan 21, 2020 #24

    longcruise

    longcruise

    longcruise

    70 Cal.

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2005
    Messages:
    5,044
    Likes Received:
    208
    Would typically be a five shot match and with six holes in the target the shooter would forfeit the highest scoring hole. Least that's how it's done in my locality.
     
    Tom Compton likes this.
  5. Jan 22, 2020 #25

    dave951

    dave951

    dave951

    40 Cal

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2019
    Messages:
    301
    Likes Received:
    190
    When we're scoring N-SSA Individuals, the targets get sorted by Class, and then by where the "cut" is for awards. The "cut" is low enough to allow for any gross errors to be caught easily. All those above the "cut" get looked at a second time by another person and the score is verified by that person. In the event of a tie, those go into another pile to be reviewed by the top dog in the Stat shack. This insures something like what happened to you can't happen. We still make mistakes, but with this method, they're fairly rare.

    We also don't score based on whether or not the bullet cut a ring. Since there can be multiple calibers, our scoring is based on the center of the bullet hole and we use transparent templates with the bullet center marked for a number of calibers.
     
    Rudyard and SamTex1949 like this.
  6. Jan 22, 2020 #26

    Carbon 6

    Carbon 6

    Carbon 6

    69 Cal.

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2018
    Messages:
    3,943
    Likes Received:
    1,601
    Only if it was possible to score more than 50 points, otherwise it would be a penalty.
     
  7. Jan 22, 2020 #27

    Carbon 6

    Carbon 6

    Carbon 6

    69 Cal.

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2018
    Messages:
    3,943
    Likes Received:
    1,601
    I've been to matches that were scored differently, The target says "NMLRA" on it but we don't know what rules were used, Only Rifleman does and he's not telling us anything.
    So, All we can do is speculate. One guess is as good as another.

    The point in my story above was that sometimes people make mistakes scoring or recording.
    Always keep your targets and always keep an eye on the leader board. Had I not, I would have been robbed of a win that was undeniably mine.

    There is one thing about Rifleman's target that no one has mentioned.
    What was scribbled out ahead of the 56 ?
     
  8. Jan 22, 2020 #28

    dave951

    dave951

    dave951

    40 Cal

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2019
    Messages:
    301
    Likes Received:
    190
    Another issue I have if it were mine, who did the scribbling, who scored it, who verified it. We have to sign off on all targets in contention.
     
  9. Jan 22, 2020 #29

    Cruzatte

    Cruzatte

    Cruzatte

    50 Cal.

    Joined:
    May 13, 2005
    Messages:
    1,441
    Likes Received:
    167
    Location:
    Lawrence, KS
    I think maybe not. I count only five holes, all single bullet holes.
     
    smo likes this.
  10. Jan 22, 2020 #30

    SDSmlf

    SDSmlf

    SDSmlf

    40 Cal.

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2006
    Messages:
    1,421
    Likes Received:
    609
    Location:
    Western North Carolina
    Guessing a grizzled veteran like yourself would not ask the question without knowing the answer. Time to let the masses know and end the speculation.
     
  11. Jan 22, 2020 #31

    Tom Compton

    Tom Compton

    Tom Compton

    54 Cal.

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2008
    Messages:
    1,696
    Likes Received:
    43
    Open sights? Your age?

    around age 40 I did the same thing. Was getting a “ghost” around the rear sight and alighting the front sight with the top of the “ghost” instead of with the top of the rear sight. Solutions, either move the rear sight further forward, see an ophthalmologist or wear an aperture on your shooting glasses.
     
  12. Jan 22, 2020 #32

    Rifleman1776

    Rifleman1776

    Rifleman1776

    Cannon MLF Supporter

    Joined:
    May 26, 2011
    Messages:
    15,987
    Likes Received:
    584
    Location:
    Arkansas Ozarks
    An 'X' is determined only if the ball is 1/2 it's diameter or more into the higher scoring ring.
    I'm sure my hold was off a trifle for the two higher shots.
    And, I would have won anyway with the score properly tallied. I'm proud of this win with a light rifle against the big boys.
     
    SamTex1949 likes this.
  13. Jan 22, 2020 #33

    Carbon 6

    Carbon 6

    Carbon 6

    69 Cal.

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2018
    Messages:
    3,943
    Likes Received:
    1,601
    Thanks for finally enlightening us as to what was wrong.

    BTW, I have seen targets scored both ways. (club rules)
     
  14. Jan 22, 2020 #34

    trent/OH

    trent/OH

    trent/OH

    58 Cal.

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2004
    Messages:
    2,428
    Likes Received:
    39
    Actually, the target says M.L.R.A. It is printed by some target company.
     
    Carbon 6 likes this.
  15. Jan 23, 2020 #35

    Carbon 6

    Carbon 6

    Carbon 6

    69 Cal.

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2018
    Messages:
    3,943
    Likes Received:
    1,601
    Good observation, and very funny, a knock-off.:thumb:
     
  16. Jan 23, 2020 #36

    Larry (Omaha)

    Larry (Omaha)

    Larry (Omaha)

    45 Cal. MLF Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2004
    Messages:
    734
    Likes Received:
    237
    Nice shooting! It is obviously a 46. Sometimes people who score think 46, but write 56. It is called a brain fart.
    Tell us a little about the rifle and sights. Your target is impressive for a non bench gun.
    Flintlocklar
     
  17. Jan 23, 2020 #37

    Rifleman1776

    Rifleman1776

    Rifleman1776

    Cannon MLF Supporter

    Joined:
    May 26, 2011
    Messages:
    15,987
    Likes Received:
    584
    Location:
    Arkansas Ozarks
    The rifle is what I call my 'half-breed'. It is a standard TC 'hawken' stock with a Douglas premium barrel and Redfield Olympic sights. It weighs about 10 pounds and has won many matches. It would have won many more if I were a better shooter. My wife has a similar half-breed based on a TC Seneca stock. She has won scores of matches with hers. I'll look to see if I have pics of them.
    [​IMG]
     

Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page

Group Builder
arrow_white