Claude...You can't take one paragraph and base my whole post on that. Go back and read all of my posts. I did make a point of stating it's not PC or a replica of any kind. Also stated it's not for rondos and that for it's intended purpose (strickly a hunting rifle) it fills the bill for a hunters flintlock.Claude said:MikeC said:With regard to the composite stock it's just innovation in materials like modern gun steel, take the metal pieces out and put them in a wood stock and you still got the same thing a flintlock.
That's true, but using that logic, you could say that a person reenacting an 18th century longhunter could wear basketball shoes and be fine. "Take away the rubber and plastic, and they're just shoes". :wink:
We've had this discussion many, many times before. Most people know the difference in a "modern muzzleloader" when they see it. If they don't, it probably doesn't matter to them anyway and that's fine. It's none of our business. Whatever works for them is fine.
The "Firestorm" is allowed to be discussed on this forum because it has a side-lock, but in my opinion, it's borderline.
I sort of agree it's borderline because of materials and modern innovations but I don't knock it entirely. That innovation is one of the things that made this country what is.
Yes the old ways are good to hold on to and we should but innovation is always good, my famalies lively hood depends on it as I'm sure many on this board does. Hey were all discussing this on a computer. :v