I do. It's a little odd to use just the trigger and more or less ignore the hammer, but you'll get used to it. (I sometimes wonder why they even put a spur on the hammer.) I can pull it and squeeze off several shots in double action pretty quickly, but I also find it very easy to cock it, aim, and use it single action for more accurate fire. No worse than any hammer-notch sight, anyway. (When I use double action I just kinda center the front sight on the frame. Almost instinctive shooting.)
One thing that's different is reloading. Even after putting it at half cock you've got to slightly depress the trigger to rotate the cylinder. Nothing to it, but different.
If you do get one, you should also buy a second cylinder. In my opinion one of the cooler things about the Starr is the way it's made for quick swaps.
A big negative, I understand, is that the hand spring assembly is apt to break, and is expensive to replace. I had mine checked out by a gunsmith right away, so that may have helped.
It's a fun revolver, and the historical factor makes it worthwhile. (Depending on the price, of course.)
If you get one, have fun with it.