Who made this 1861 Colt replica revolver?
This is my second post about the 1861 COLT replica revolver I am picturing below. I messed up the link to the pictures and could not repair it. My fault entirely. I am starting fresh, hoping someone can tell me the manufacturer. It has two Italian Black Powder proof marks and an “XXI” stamp indicating 1965 as manufacture date. The top of the barrel is stamped ”NEW NAVY MOD. 1861 CAL. 36” in small letters. It also has “1” and “9” stamped in a couple of places: I suspect assembly numbers. The serial number is N1045. I can find no other stamps or markings on this revolver. I can find nothing to indicate its manufacturer.
This is a nice pistol. Parts fit together like they should. Very little cylinder movement when the hammer is cocked. I’d say it’s a better quality item.
But I really would like to know what Italian replica manufacturer made it. I’d like to think that one of your forum followers can tell me what company is responsible for this revolver.
Thanks, MAK
Again; really sorry for the screw-up with the previous post’s photos.
This is my second post about the 1861 COLT replica revolver I am picturing below. I messed up the link to the pictures and could not repair it. My fault entirely. I am starting fresh, hoping someone can tell me the manufacturer. It has two Italian Black Powder proof marks and an “XXI” stamp indicating 1965 as manufacture date. The top of the barrel is stamped ”NEW NAVY MOD. 1861 CAL. 36” in small letters. It also has “1” and “9” stamped in a couple of places: I suspect assembly numbers. The serial number is N1045. I can find no other stamps or markings on this revolver. I can find nothing to indicate its manufacturer.
This is a nice pistol. Parts fit together like they should. Very little cylinder movement when the hammer is cocked. I’d say it’s a better quality item.
But I really would like to know what Italian replica manufacturer made it. I’d like to think that one of your forum followers can tell me what company is responsible for this revolver.
Thanks, MAK
Again; really sorry for the screw-up with the previous post’s photos.