• This community needs YOUR help today. We rely 100% on Supporting Memberships to fund our efforts. With the ever increasing fees of everything, we need help. We need more Supporting Members, today. Please invest back into this community. I will ship a few decals too in addition to all the account perks you get.



    Sign up here: https://www.muzzleloadingforum.com/account/upgrades
  • Friends, our 2nd Amendment rights are always under attack and the NRA has been a constant for decades in helping fight that fight.

    We have partnered with the NRA to offer you a discount on membership and Muzzleloading Forum gets a small percentage too of each membership, so you are supporting both the NRA and us.

    Use this link to sign up please; https://membership.nra.org/recruiters/join/XR045103

Treatise on shooting a Petronel

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I have been rash enough to make two of them ,the first for the Ship replica of' The Golden Hinde '(the crews preferred spelling) its now in a Winnipeg Museum along with a rude Caliver I also made with kit entire for the Gunner 'Sam the Mariner ' . I hunted Wood pigeons with both and shot the Caliver at Bisley's Short Siberia Range MLAGB Champs in 1974 if not in any match ,
I don't recall the Petronel as too unhandy but likley was .It was at least bigger than the last one I made recently as it came out small & so unhandy I gave up the' from the chest' notion & held & shot it like you would a Jap Matchlock only it didn't have the snap lock however results whern't so bad considering. Would I go after a wild pig?' No'. but a bunny well be ok with that if the bunny is unlikey to oblige . As ergonomic designs go the Petronel was a failure I think . But the engravings' dont lie So they must have used such awkward guns regardless of our views in long hind sight . Great topic anyway .
Regards Rudyard
Added pics showing Petronels
1692857788736.png
1692857807946.png
 

Attachments

  • 1692857822460.png
    1692857822460.png
    945.8 KB · Views: 0
It has been a fascinating read in this thread. I dont know anything really about these but can add this page from a 17th century Chinese document on firearms

petronal.png
 
It has been a fascinating read in this thread. I dont know anything really about these but can add this page from a 17th century Chinese document on firearms

View attachment 252681
Given the rest and lever for the trigger, I wonder if that is a Chinese illustration of a European petronel musket? From what I have read, some of these Chinese arms compendiums include all known weapons, including European weapons they have come in contact with.

This forum really needs a Chinese arms expert, or someone fluent in mandarin...
 
Hmmmm, doesn't the extreme curvature of the butt make this a prime candidate for a broken stock? I got some carbine length oct-to-round 58-cal barrels and want to make one ... but orienting the grain correctly is a concern.
 
Hmmmm, doesn't the extreme curvature of the butt make this a prime candidate for a broken stock? I got some carbine length oct-to-round 58-cal barrels and want to make one ... but orienting the grain correctly is a concern.
After doing more research... I think most of the time they just didn't care...

These all look like they have some needlessly fragile stock shapes:
Petronel.jpg

84B9069D-1DD8-B71C-07DBDCF33DAAABE8Original.jpg

OlympiaPetronel1.jpg


This is an over 20lbs musket and the photo is only *slightly* distorted. I have a really low res one that is of a better angle and its stock looks like a boomerang
mi10055g03a_160.jpg



German military Petronels often had metal bands reinforcing them, at least:
Graz30 kl.jpg

Graz31 kl.jpg

L-Petronell, Nbg., _1575-85.  1 kl.jpg

L-Petronell, Nbg., ~1575-85.  4 kl.jpg
 
Here's a breastplate that was dug up at Jamestown, so early 17th c. Note the added plate on the right shoulder. The researchers reasoned that it was an attempt to make shouldering a musket easier. Whether or not they did generally shoulder muskets or were able to shoulder muskets in a practical sense, it seems there was a desire to do so.

Jamestown breastplate.jpg
 
Here's a breastplate that was dug up at Jamestown, so early 17th c. Note the added plate on the right shoulder. The researchers reasoned that it was an attempt to make shouldering a musket easier. Whether or not they did generally shoulder muskets or were able to shoulder muskets in a practical sense, it seems there was a desire to do so.

View attachment 253143
Based on the talks from their YouTube channel, it sounds like that was more of a solution to deal with the combat with the Powhattan, because the breastplate had a justifiable utility against bows and clubs.

Already by the first quarter of the 16th century, gunners had mostly abandoned armor.

I have been wondering if the smaller petronels were used with a cavalry cuirass, due to sources calling them cavalry arms. Hopefully something that can be tested one day...
 
Last edited:
Given the rest and lever for the trigger, I wonder if that is a Chinese illustration of a European petronel musket? From what I have read, some of these Chinese arms compendiums include all known weapons, including European weapons they have come in contact with.

This forum really needs a Chinese arms expert, or someone fluent in mandarin...
This document is a list of arms that were tested by the Chinese military at the time
 
Based on the talks from their YouTube channel, it sounds like that was more of a solution to deal with the combat with the Powhattan, because the breastplate had a justifiable utility against bows and clubs.

Already by the first quarter of the 16th century, gunners had mostly abandoned armor.

I have been wondering if the smaller petronels were used with a cavalry cuirass, due to sources calling them cavalry arms. Hopefully something that can be tested one day...
The breastplate itself was to deal with clubs and arrows, but most breastplates didn't have that added tab of iron at the right shoulder. The theory is that the butt of the musket would hook into the angle between the tab and the rest of the breastplate and not drop onto the bicep of the shooter.
 
Not having a breast plate I tried to make do with just the breast. After many contortions I concluded it was either too small or me too big for it, and I ended up shooting it like a Japanese M lock only it lacked the snap lock but worked once I got used to it . But a discerning patron wanted it .so Ile have to make another or stick with my other M locks (Thayve been fretting that I've been neglecting them ) .You know how Matchlocks are .
Regards Rudyard
 
Not having a breast plate I tried to make do with just the breast. After many contortions I concluded it was either too small or me too big for it, and I ended up shooting it like a Japanese M lock only it lacked the snap lock but worked once I got used to it . But a discerning patron wanted it .so Ile have to make another or stick with my other M locks (Thayve been fretting that I've been neglecting them ) .You know how Matchlocks are .
Regards Rudyard
Hey, I resemble that remark!
 
Hmmmm, doesn't the extreme curvature of the butt make this a prime candidate for a broken stock? I got some carbine length oct-to-round 58-cal barrels and want to make one ... but orienting the grain correctly is a concern.
Please forgive the belated response regarding the extreme curvature of the buttstock and relative grain structure. Can't help but wonder: did any of the makers utilize the ancient process of STEAM BENDING the wood to retain the integrity of the grain?
 
Please forgive the belated response regarding the extreme curvature of the buttstock and relative grain structure. Can't help but wonder: did any of the makers utilize the ancient process of STEAM BENDING the wood to retain the integrity of the grain?
For a lot of them, it looks like the grain was not really matched to the stock style, so probably not?

However… i have seen a higher resolution image of this gun and the bottom half of the extreme curved butt stock is a separate grafted piece that looks to have a vertical oriented grain
IMG_9804.jpeg
 
For a lot of them, it looks like the grain was not really matched to the stock style, so probably not?

However… i have seen a higher resolution image of this gun and the bottom half of the extreme curved butt stock is a separate grafted piece that looks to have a vertical oriented grain
View attachment 264927
Thanks for your response. Using the photos I couldn't discern much of the grain with old eyes. Interesting that they went to a vertical spliced joint solution in your example. I've toyed with the idea of doing a steam bent stock but lack the experience in that endeavor...at my age it appears doubtful.
 
Please forgive the belated response regarding the extreme curvature of the buttstock and relative grain structure. Can't help but wonder: did any of the makers utilize the ancient process of STEAM BENDING the wood to retain the integrity of the grain?
Sure best to have grain naturally curved last I made did have ,the first one for' Golden Hinde' gunner not sure been years since ,like 1973 but its in a Museum in Winnipeg belongs the Gunner Sam who sailed on her its in the Peg because his earlier ship as gunner was the' Nonesuch' the first Hudsons Bay vessel now resides there inside a museum . I first met Sam in Horeshoe Bay BC but worked on the' Hinde' when rigging her out in Hinks Yards in Appledore Devon where I delivered the two matchlocks & kit .Might have got on as crew but had bussiness in India so wasn't to be .kind of the road not taken' always fancied deep water sail never been sea sick & can sing' off key' Sea shanties with the best of them .Made it up with a Cayman Island Tramp and steam ships .Steam & Black powder are related elements you cant push a button &' demand 'something ,You got to jolly them both to get the best of them .Bit like Sam Wellers coaches & guns in Pickwick tales .
Being whimsical Rudyard
 

Latest posts

Back
Top