No I don't. l'm not sure I am a good enough photographer to get a good one, but will try tomorrow. Just take a light stroke across with a file, and take a look. You should end up with an angled cut equal to the width of your sight. You will be able to tell the difference in how the light hits the sight right away. Just go slow, and keep checking the sight picture. Every one who has tried my rifles to see how well it works, have altered their sights.Would you happen to have a pic of that waksupi?
Timber
The eye has a finite depth of focus. You can not get a sharp, focused image of both sights and a 50, or even a 10, yard target. Hence the adage: "Front sight. Press."Old thread, but still valid. I was at the range yesterday and on a dare tried a set of mild (+1.25 diopter) reading glasses and it brought both sights into crisp focus, and I could still see the target at 50 yds, but of course blurred. I may try to find a +1.00, +75, or even a +.50 if they make them, just to experiment.
The eye has a finite depth of focus. You can not get a sharp, focused image of both sights and a 50, or even a 10, yard target. Hence the adage: "Front sight. Press."
They do make those very modestly power glasses. I found the .75 and .50 glasses on ebay or Amazon. They are plastic lenses and scratch easily. For the price, they are worth the effort to find. Yes, they do work. I have found 1.000 readers at the Dollar Store.Old thread, but still valid. I was at the range yesterday and on a dare tried a set of mild (+1.25 diopter) reading glasses and it brought both sights into crisp focus, and I could still see the target at 50 yds, but of course blurred. I may try to find a +1.00, +75, or even a +.50 if they make them, just to experiment.
Enter your email address to join: