Mike Brooks
Cannon
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2005
- Messages
- 6,686
- Reaction score
- 28
Who are you and what do you have against me? It's always nice to be able to connect a real name to a post like this. This way I'll know who you are when I see you at a gun show and I can tell you to move along to somebody else's table.smoothflinter said:I wonder if there is any historical value to this string of posts. Do you suppose back in the day that gunsmiths fixed and then put the mouth on other's works? I'm thinking that they may have been more pious back then and information was much slower getting around. But I'm definitely not an expert on the subject. Tongues may have wagged back then, but most likely behind closed doors. Just a hypothesis on my part. In my frame of thought the door is wide open here for the public hear.
"Hear ye......hear ye. Gunsmith X has proclaimed that the works of gunsmith Y's rifles are inferior and should be avoided. Gunsmith Y has stated that gunsmith X's rifles are of good quality. Furthermore, gunsmith X has impecable character as was self-proclaimed upon this day."
Hey, will somebody turn off the gas lamp. I'm going to bed.
The poster asked about Narraganset guns. I have alot of experience with them due to my business. I truthfully related my experience with Narraganset guns which I think every potential buyer of a Narraganset should know...or should I have lied and said they were the greatest guns I have ever handled? I could have expanded and related experiences that were just as bad about other gun maker's guns that have came through my shop, some of those who already hate me and post here, but I didn't as that information wasn't asked for.....I was specific and only gave the information the poster was seeking.
As far as the historical context, yes there was some friction between gun makers. I'm familiar with the schutzen era and those guys didn't hesitate to point out manure when they saw it. In fact it's only this "Modern age" that controversy over poor built guns has become a forbidden subject.