• This community needs YOUR help today. We rely 100% on Supporting Memberships to fund our efforts. With the ever increasing fees of everything, we need help. We need more Supporting Members, today. Please invest back into this community. I will ship a few decals too in addition to all the account perks you get.



    Sign up here: https://www.muzzleloadingforum.com/account/upgrades
  • Friends, our 2nd Amendment rights are always under attack and the NRA has been a constant for decades in helping fight that fight.

    We have partnered with the NRA to offer you a discount on membership and Muzzleloading Forum gets a small percentage too of each membership, so you are supporting both the NRA and us.

    Use this link to sign up please; https://membership.nra.org/recruiters/join/XR045103

Load development today

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

1BadDart

45 Cal.
Joined
Dec 26, 2021
Messages
703
Reaction score
960
Location
W. KY.
I've been working with my .40 Virginia build and was having issues with holes in the patches, a thicker patch cured that. Since the load I was shooting, 45gr of FFF was worked up with the thin patch. Today I set the bench up and went through load testing again. The rifle was built to shoot offhand, but all testing was done from a bench with a front rest and rear bag. I started with 40 grains and worked up to 60, 55 was the best. I'm on my last tin of Remington caps, after that it'll be CCI's. I didn't think about it until I was halfway through, so I finished the tests, then went back to the best charge and shot the CCI's. I may do a little more testing around 55 grains just to see what it does.

IMG_6321.jpg
 
Thanks Rock Home, we use that target for 50 yard rimfire benchrest. I save them from practice and shoot them with the ML
 
Last edited:
Patches that have holes after firing usually acquire those holes during the loading process. Those patches are too thin to begin with. Smooth that rifle crown with your thumb and sandpaper, it can be done in half an hour easily. Use the thickest patch (experiment), well lubed, that you can safely seat with the wood ramrod. Mattress ticking usually runs a little thicker than pillow ticking at around .018". You shouldn't be able to feel the rifling lands with your thumb when you turn the tip back and forth in the muzzle if the smoothing was done properly. Do a good job and you might be surprised at the thickness of the patches you can seat the ball in.
 
Patches that have holes after firing usually acquire those holes during the loading process. Those patches are too thin to begin with. Smooth that rifle crown with your thumb and sandpaper, it can be done in half an hour easily. Use the thickest patch (experiment), well lubed, that you can safely seat with the wood ramrod. Mattress ticking usually runs a little thicker than pillow ticking at around .018". You shouldn't be able to feel the rifling lands with your thumb when you turn the tip back and forth in the muzzle if the smoothing was done properly. Do a good job and you might be surprised at the thickness of the patches you can seat the ball in.
When I was chasing the hole problem, I loaded and pulled several balls, some intentionally, some not, LOL. None of the patches on the pulled balls had holes. I bought a conical stone and cut the muzzle, then sanded with 180, 220 and finally 320 grit sandpaper, still had holes after firing.

The patching material was .016" pillow ticking with a .395" ball. I have some .400" balls, so I tried them with the same patch material. Six shots no holes, I went back to the .395" ball, holes again, .400" balls again, no holes. I bought some heavier tight weave cotton, about .019" after washing, no holes with the .395" ball. Today I picked up some cotton duck material that is .021" before washing. It's in the washing machine now and it'll be late next week before I can shoot any of it.
 
Back
Top