• Friends, our 2nd Amendment rights are always under attack and the NRA has been a constant for decades in helping fight that fight.

    We have partnered with the NRA to offer you a discount on membership and Muzzleloading Forum gets a small percentage too of each membership, so you are supporting both the NRA and us.

    Use this link to sign up please; https://membership.nra.org/recruiters/join/XR045103

"Do" try this at home............

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

ebiggs1

69 Cal.
Joined
Apr 27, 2009
Messages
3,893
Reaction score
12
Mr. Pletcher suggests everybody try to take a picture of your lock as it is working. I agree. It will tell you a lot. If you are observant, you may learn some facts that you may have thought wrong.
This is the L&R replacement lock for a GPR and/or a TC (very similar).

IMG_2578.jpg


A lot of you, maybe most, think it is an upgrade over the factory locks that come with the rifles. It is not. It is different but it is not better.
One thing to notice right off is where the sparks tend to fall? They seem to be slightly ahead of the pan. Now let's consider the pan. It is narrow and deep. Deeper and more narrow than either the Lyman or TC factory lock. Both of them are wider and spread the prime out over a greater area. Equals a greater chance the prime will light off.
This lock produces a goodly supply of sparks but this lock also had to make a return trip to L&R for a second chance to get it right.

Just because the L&R comes with leaf springs and the others coil did not make it better. Some believe anything with leaf V type springs has to be better than a lock with coils springs.

You can see the cock is not blurred. That means the camera was not fast enough to catch it's fall until it came to rest. But there does seem to be some rebound with the frizzen as is does show some blur.

At the end of the cock's travel it is exacly where a good lock should have it. Directly pointing in the pan.

One more thing, you may notice is the flint is getting pretty dull. Flints need to be sharp to work. Really? Maybe again not as sharp as thought. You might tell this flint has been used many, many times but is still working pretty well.

Anyway try this easy test on your own equipment, you may just learn soemthing you didn't know.

EXIF data Canon XTi with 100mm f2.8 Macro lens, ISO 100, TV 1 sec, AV f4.
 
I like the fact you gave the camera details. I have often thought of taking a picture but did not have any idea of what settings to use. :hmm:
 
I am sure you would want to tend more to a sharp flint than a dull one. But that said, they will work under pretty poor conditions.
 
ohio ramrod said:
I like the fact you gave the camera details. I have often thought of taking a picture but did not have any idea of what settings to use. :hmm:

I'm not going to do it even though I am an avid photog. Those sparks might do damage to the camera lens. Most (all?) of which are plastic these days.

Edit: OK, OK I could take the pics from a distance and zoom in. Another complexication.
 
You did notice it was a 100mm lens on a crop camera? 100mm = 160mm, plus Photo Shop (to enlarge) so there is very little chance of damage.
Anyone that owns the most basic kit lens and camera equipment can do this. :thumbsup:

PS I have no plastic lens! :grin:
 
Okay, I'll play.

First is a 80's era Chambers flintlock made by Walter Cain. Still my main rifle.

chmbr.jpg


Next is a Traditions rifle I just put together for my son. The frizzen spring was installed wrong, I corrected it. Other than that, no changes to the lock.

trad.jpg


Of course, the reflex mirror broke on the camera after the second rifle, so it will be a bit before I can try any others.

EXIF data Canon EOS Digital Rebel f/5.6 TV 0.5 sec, ISO100 Fl 80mm
 
Back
Top