Bitterroot Sherpa said:I know no one here cares but I personally have no issue with inlines. As far as I'm concerned they are just muzzleloaders. The only supposed advantage to them is more reliable ignition. However according to most muzzleloaders, sidelocks rarely if ever misfire. Where's the advantage? Isn't one. I suppose they are easier to scope. I am ok with not allowing scopes. I am not ok with not allowing one type of muzzleloader over another. This is just just a tactic of non hunters to divide us. Anyways that's just my 2 cents. I suppose that a muzzleloading rifle designed to accept smokeless powder would not be ok too. I think we could have a more grey approach to this than just black or white. Bottom line is that an open sight inline firing BP or sub (regardless of primer size or type) has no better chance of hitting a target than a sidelock. Both are accurate, reliable & powerful & have similar sighting equipment.
Bitterroot Sherpa said:I know no one here cares but I personally have no issue with inlines. As far as I'm concerned they are just muzzleloaders. ..... I am not ok with not allowing one type of muzzleloader over another. This is just just a tactic of non hunters to divide us.......
Snakebite said:last time I checked they were anywhere from $2500 to $10K to hunt. And that is for 1 gun (person). That's some pretty expensive venison.
Enter your email address to join: