• This community needs YOUR help today. We rely 100% on Supporting Memberships to fund our efforts. With the ever increasing fees of everything, we need help. We need more Supporting Members, today. Please invest back into this community. I will ship a few decals too in addition to all the account perks you get.



    Sign up here: https://www.muzzleloadingforum.com/account/upgrades
  • Friends, our 2nd Amendment rights are always under attack and the NRA has been a constant for decades in helping fight that fight.

    We have partnered with the NRA to offer you a discount on membership and Muzzleloading Forum gets a small percentage too of each membership, so you are supporting both the NRA and us.

    Use this link to sign up please; https://membership.nra.org/recruiters/join/XR045103

Making touch hole bigger

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
:thumbsup: Rich.

The first step in scientific problem solving is to ACCURATELY define the problem.
 
I am convinced that weak sparks contribute to miss fires even with pan flashes!

In my opinion you have to have good even and consistent sparks before anything else.

Getting real flint is a step in the right direction.
 
Rifleman1776 said:
Not meaning to....uh....dampen on yer flash pan, but someone who has never had ignition problems has never shot a flintlock.

May be true, but please note my statement is in the present tense--not the past. I have been building and shooting flintlocks for over 50 years and in that time I have learned a thing or two about making a flintlock go BANG.
 
LJA said:
Rifleman1776 said:
Not meaning to....uh....dampen on yer flash pan, but someone who has never had ignition problems has never shot a flintlock.

May be true, but please note my statement is in the present tense--not the past. I have been building and shooting flintlocks for over 50 years and in that time I have learned a thing or two about making a flintlock go BANG.


Please take my ranting with a sense of humor. Fact is, if flintlocks were as reliable as a center fire modern rifle there would be little point in using them. We are taking a couple steps back in time, for me, as an exercise to appreciate the hardships of those days. A fussy flint reminds us of that with every "clack".
 
Skychief said:
54ball said:
I am convinced that weak sparks contribute to miss fires even with pan flashes!


How could that be?

Honestly I don't know. It may have something to do with where the few sparks land.

What I do know is a gun with a dull flint or some kind of lock-frizzen problem will be inconsistent.

Sometime it will fire.....
Sometimes it will klatch.....nothing.
Sometimes it will pan flash.
Sometimes there will be a hang fire.
Sometimes there will be a hang.....flash.

A friend of mine had problems like that above with a Pedersoli Musket. He sent the lock to the service center....same trouble unreliable with failure to fire and pan flashes.
He got a new lock from Italy.....
Different gun...It's a good shooter now. It's amazing the difference.

Now if there is consistent quick pan flashes....there is a problem with the vent.

Inconsistency....Get the sparks first...then go further.
 
Skychief said:
54ball said:
I am convinced that weak sparks contribute to miss fires even with pan flashes!


How could that be?

This is a job for Pletch.

It COULD be, that a flint that produces just a single spark that sets off the pan has a pan flash that is longer in duration, and less intense in its' heat production, than a pan that is ignited in multiple places by a whole flock of sparks, but I suspect any differences would be relatively minor. Not enough to make the difference you're discussing. But, I also have no evidence to back it up either.
 
Many years ago I had a lot of misfires. But at the present I can't recall the last time one of my flinters failed to fire. There's a lot to be said for experience.
As for drilling out the touch hole this is what was recommended to me by a phone call to Chambers years ago.
The WL liner comes with a small hole. After completing your rifle and testing it for proper sparking, go to the range and shoot it a few times. If you have ignition problems then take a Number drill one size larger than the TH and drill it out. Shoot it again to test ignition. Only drill one Number size at a time. The diameter of the drills are only a few thousands larger per drill size, but the circumference of the drilled hole is increased significally. Usually only a drill size or two provides you with the desired result.
I used to alter metric liners as part of a service I did to get store bought flinters to ignite consistently. Then I discovered these liners and they already had the mod.s I was doing. Though they still required drilling out. One could buy a few and experiment on them being they screw out. You can't do that with a WL as it's a permanent installation. https://www.rmcoxyoke.com/inc/sdetail/rmc_flintlock_touch_hole_liner_replacements/6549/84

This will only help you if you've got a good spark. You got to get the sparking problem worked out first.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Latest posts

Back
Top