• This community needs YOUR help today. We rely 100% on Supporting Memberships to fund our efforts. With the ever increasing fees of everything, we need help. We need more Supporting Members, today. Please invest back into this community. I will ship a few decals too in addition to all the account perks you get.



    Sign up here: https://www.muzzleloadingforum.com/account/upgrades
  • Friends, our 2nd Amendment rights are always under attack and the NRA has been a constant for decades in helping fight that fight.

    We have partnered with the NRA to offer you a discount on membership and Muzzleloading Forum gets a small percentage too of each membership, so you are supporting both the NRA and us.

    Use this link to sign up please; https://membership.nra.org/recruiters/join/XR045103

Load for a .36 Navy

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Something's missing in this thread...

28888736197_5d9603e1d8_b.jpg
 
Big difference in the weight of the projectile...from 80 gr ball to 158 gr .38 Special.
Also a big difference in velocity, favoring the .36, and big difference in diameter, favors the .36, .380" compared to .357". Tends to even things out.
 
20 grains for a round ball would be a good start. However, the US and CS Army Ordnance Manual load was 17 grains and a Conical bullet. We sell molds for both the Colt .36 cal 126 grain conical and the Richmond Laboratory .36 cal 146 grain bullet. www.erasgonebullets.webstarts.com
 
1861 Navy, Uberti with a steel frame. I'm getting various info from the web; I think about 20 gr. fffg, round ball, mainly because I have a spout for that amount for my flask. Does that sound about right?
Here's a formula that will provide a safe good average on any load:
Bore diameter radius sq x 3.1416 x barrel length x 15.72
 
Back
Top