• This community needs YOUR help today. We rely 100% on Supporting Memberships to fund our efforts. With the ever increasing fees of everything, we need help. We need more Supporting Members, today. Please invest back into this community. I will ship a few decals too in addition to all the account perks you get.



    Sign up here: https://www.muzzleloadingforum.com/account/upgrades
  • Friends, our 2nd Amendment rights are always under attack and the NRA has been a constant for decades in helping fight that fight.

    We have partnered with the NRA to offer you a discount on membership and Muzzleloading Forum gets a small percentage too of each membership, so you are supporting both the NRA and us.

    Use this link to sign up please; https://membership.nra.org/recruiters/join/XR045103

Adjusting non adjustable sights

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
The farther back I move the farther off it gets gets.

First cap and ball pistol I ever fired had sites that were way off and with the Colt style it's always been very difficult to figure a way to adjust these so they will hit the nail on the head.

So, anybody , that has dealt with this issue before . . .

It would help to know what Colt style you have though agreed they all are alike for a fix.

We would need to know what the front sight attachment method is and that does vary. A let and right dovetail and you can use various means to drift it and secure it and get the windage corrected.

To high and you are talking about a taller front sight or filing the rear hammer notch down.

You do know that double the distance and you double the offset its hitting at?

So you can get it spot on at 10 yards and then out at 15 yards its going to be off one way or the other left and right and high or low. Where I would disagree with Blackie is you need to shoot more rounds (certainly 10 yards and further) as you need to find the average not where a single round hits.

You just work your way out to whatever your desired shooting distance is.

I am not into pistol bullet trajectory like I am rifles, but you more or less can't have perfect due to Point of Aim, sight difference above the barrel and any drop the bullet makes (probably out past 20 yards but that is a guess)

I have shot 22 at 100 yards and its a good 6 inches off from a 50 yards sight which a 22 is more in line with pistols (lot of drop though bullet doing 3000 fps, a rifle starts to drop lots out past 250 yards).


 
Last edited:
I always start with replacing the front sight on the Army models. The sight made for the Open Top Uberti fits perfectly into the slot on the 1860/61’s. Vtigunparts has them.
 
It would help to know what Colt style you have though agreed they all are alike for a fix.

We would need to know what the front sight attachment method is and that does vary. A let and right dovetail and you can use various means to drift it and secure it and get the windage corrected.

To high and you are talking about a taller front sight or filing the rear hammer notch down.

You do know that double the distance and you double the offset its hitting at?

So you can get it spot on at 10 yards and then out at 15 yards its going to be off one way or the other left and right and high or low. Where I would disagree with Blackie is you need to shoot more rounds (certainly 10 yards and further) as you need to find the average not where a single round hits.

You just work your way out to whatever your desired shooting distance is.

I am not into pistol bullet trajectory like I am rifles, but you more or less can't have perfect due to Point of Aim, sight difference above the barrel and any drop the bullet makes (probably out past 20 yards but that is a guess)

I have shot 22 at 100 yards and its a good 6 inches off from a 50 yards sight which a 22 is more in line with pistols (lot of drop though bullet doing 3000 fps, a rifle starts to drop lots out past 250 yards).
It will be off for trajectory as distance increases after correction but not windage .
 
Last edited:
when a piece is hitin off to the right, move the rear sight to the left, and that brings it in line.
I know that folks in the 1800s, and in the 1900s and even nowadays have had to deal with this,
I don't want to start cutting the hammer notch out because it'll make it look Goofy.
the front sight is such a dainty little thing I don't want to start messing with it
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20240103-182727~2.png
    Screenshot_20240103-182727~2.png
    422.7 KB · Views: 0
when a piece is hitin off to the right, move the rear sight to the left, and that brings it in line.
I know that folks in the 1800s, and in the 1900s and even nowadays have had to deal with this,
I don't want to start cutting the hammer notch out because it'll make it look Goofy.
the front sight is such a dainty little thing I don't want to start messing with it
I guess you can always put a bend in the barrel to regulate windage but I'd rather cut a dovetail and mill a new front blade. Here is one I did on my 62 Police.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2383.JPG
    IMG_2383.JPG
    3 MB · Views: 0
  • IMG_2384.JPG
    IMG_2384.JPG
    3.4 MB · Views: 0
I like bladed front sights, I don't like the little Spike front sights like on the remington 1858 and the 1851 navies they tend to hang up in a holster and sometimes they come off.
 
I always start with replacing the front sight on the Army models. The sight made for the Open Top Uberti fits perfectly into the slot on the 1860/61’s. Vtigunparts has them.
So when I think of open top I'm thinking of the model 1872 open top conversion or factory cartridge revolver.

But I think you're referring to something different than what I'm thinking .
can you post a few pictures of what you've done with yours?
 
I guess you can always put a bend in the barrel to regulate windage but I'd rather cut a dovetail and mill a new front blade. Here is one I did on my 62 Police.

A friend asked me to check out his Remington 740. I get down to the range and looking down the barrel and you can see a bend., Hmnm, this is not going to go well.

Lined up the scope on target at 50 yards and it was centered and even. 100 yards centered and our normal 2 inches high. Well as long its consistent it can be a pretzel. I did not mess with his mind, you got it sighted in perfecly and it shoot a bit over an inch group at 100 yards.
 
So when I think of open top I'm thinking of the model 1872 open top conversion or factory cartridge revolver.

But I think you're referring to something different than what I'm thinking .
can you post a few pictures of what you've done with yours?
Yes. The 1872, any of the conversion guns have the taller sight. You can just pop the sight out with a brass punch. It slides right out of the groove in the barrel, new one is popped in place with a small hammer and I finish with a bit of Force44 solder from brownells.

IMG_0736.jpeg
IMG_0737.jpeg
IMG_1179.jpeg
 
A friend asked me to check out his Remington 740. I get down to the range and looking down the barrel and you can see a bend., Hmnm, this is not going to go well.

Lined up the scope on target at 50 yards and it was centered and even. 100 yards centered and our normal 2 inches high. Well as long its consistent it can be a pretzel. I did not mess with his mind, you got it sighted in perfecly and it shoot a bit over an inch group at 100 yards.
Barrel bending is as old as boring and rifling and is usually for rifle length tubes . Factories used to do it routinely in over head bending vices viewed through the bore at a bright light and hanging wire.
No barrel is deep hole bored perfectly straight but they do get them pretty close now days. I still have to orientate any barrel I mount vertically or they will shoot off to one side or the other making open sight set over necessary which looks goofy to me.
I just had to straighten a high end Badger .30 cal barrel that was so bent I could only see half a hole when viewing through it. I think some one drove over it with a truck or something as I have never seen one that crooked before.
These hand guns made for the military only had very rudimentary sights designed for close range body hits not precision shooting although they are capable of fine accuracy with good sight picture.
 
I guess you can always put a bend in the barrel to regulate windage but I'd rather cut a dovetail and mill a new front blade. Here is one I did on my 62 Police.
This milled brass sight was installed (sweat soldered) in the original barrel cut as all it needed was elevation not windage.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2507.JPG
    IMG_2507.JPG
    537.4 KB · Views: 0
Went to unthread the front sight and found as I turned it it actually changed positions, it seems to be bent a little bit and as I turned it it was bent the other way.

At a distance of 20 ft it seems to be doing the quite a bit better
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20240108-160713~2.png
    Screenshot_20240108-160713~2.png
    408.2 KB · Views: 0
when a piece is hitin off to the right, move the rear sight to the left, and that brings it in line.
I know that folks in the 1800s, and in the 1900s and even nowadays have had to deal with this,
I don't want to start cutting the hammer notch out because it'll make it look Goofy.
the front sight is such a dainty little thing I don't want to start messing with it
You’re going to have to do one, the other, or both…
 
I've seen this done but it shortens the sight radius by 2.5 -3 inches and usually has to be set so far off center it becomes impractical for looks or holstering.
Another option I have used on rifle barrels for a front sight set over without a dovetail is to cut the front blade off set. I recently did this to a new Douglas barrel I had to contour to original profile in a Springfield cadet rifle . I turned the front sight band and base integral with the barrel and made an offset front blade that worked out perfectly for windage adjustment.
No reason at all the same cannot be done on a fixed sighted revolver.
The set over was .050 on a sight blade of .100 wide but still looks centered.
It works perfectly with a Lolly pop rear tang aperture sight.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2068.JPG
    IMG_2068.JPG
    193.7 KB · Views: 0
  • IMG_2076.JPG
    IMG_2076.JPG
    188.9 KB · Views: 0
  • IMG_2078.JPG
    IMG_2078.JPG
    152.8 KB · Views: 0
  • IMG_2095.JPG
    IMG_2095.JPG
    100.8 KB · Views: 0
  • IMG_2096.JPG
    IMG_2096.JPG
    95 KB · Views: 0
  • IMG_2105.JPG
    IMG_2105.JPG
    104 KB · Views: 0
Last edited:
I've seen this done but it shortens the sight radius by 2.5 -3 inches and usually has to be set so far off center it becomes impractical for looks or holstering.
Another option I have used on rifle barrels for a front sight set over without a dovetail is to cut the front blade off set. I recently did this to a new Douglas barrel I had to contour to original profile in a Springfield cadet rifle . I turned the front sight band and base integral with the barrel and made an offset front blade that worked out perfectly for windage adjustment.
No reason at all the same cannot be done on a fixed sighted revolver.
The set over was .050 on a sight blade of .100 wide but still looks centered.
It works perfectly with a Lolly pop rear tang aperture sight.
Remember that the shorter the sight radius the less the rear sight has to move to effect the same amount of change as a longer sight radius does but the down side is one also looses the definition of finer sighting mechanics of longer sight radius.
There is always a trade off to one degree or another so one has to adjust to the best compromise for the type of shooting they will be experiencing.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top