• This community needs YOUR help today. We rely 100% on Supporting Memberships to fund our efforts. With the ever increasing fees of everything, we need help. We need more Supporting Members, today. Please invest back into this community. I will ship a few decals too in addition to all the account perks you get.



    Sign up here: https://www.muzzleloadingforum.com/account/upgrades
  • Friends, our 2nd Amendment rights are always under attack and the NRA has been a constant for decades in helping fight that fight.

    We have partnered with the NRA to offer you a discount on membership and Muzzleloading Forum gets a small percentage too of each membership, so you are supporting both the NRA and us.

    Use this link to sign up please; https://membership.nra.org/recruiters/join/XR045103

.451 vs .454

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
My bad. Too much Covid manure and politics on my mind.

I really meant to ask if the .454 balls could be shot in my 44 Cal revolver in lieu of .451 balls.

Sorry for the stupid mistake.
 
I use .457” balls in my Remington. But the chambers have been reamed to .449” and chamfered. From far too much reading I see a lot of competition shooters choosing a .457” ball, and have seen a couple of posted instances where when the ball size went up and all else stayed the same the results were a faster ball, which tells you the friction was greater to give such an improvement. I’ve also seen how through the Pietta 1863 with grossly undersized chambers that the normal ball was pathetic, but when an oversized ball as used it suddenly improved. More hearing surface to obturate seems to be the idea there where the smaller ball couldn’t completely fill the grooves.
 
I used .451" balls in my Remmy 1858 c&b I used to own. When I got a Rogers & Spencer I needed the larger .454" as the .451" didn't seal the chambers.
 
Back
Top