• This community needs YOUR help today. We rely 100% on Supporting Memberships to fund our efforts. With the ever increasing fees of everything, we need help. We need more Supporting Members, today. Please invest back into this community. I will ship a few decals too in addition to all the account perks you get.



    Sign up here: https://www.muzzleloadingforum.com/account/upgrades
  • Friends, our 2nd Amendment rights are always under attack and the NRA has been a constant for decades in helping fight that fight.

    We have partnered with the NRA to offer you a discount on membership and Muzzleloading Forum gets a small percentage too of each membership, so you are supporting both the NRA and us.

    Use this link to sign up please; https://membership.nra.org/recruiters/join/XR045103

Rifle TC should have made?

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

ebiggs1

69 Cal.
Joined
Apr 27, 2009
Messages
3,893
Reaction score
12
Well here we are some 24 TC rifles later and now I have completed the gun that Thompson Center should have made. IN MY HUMBLE OPINION of coarse. :v

I slim the wist area down more than TC does, also the forearm is thinner.. I add a toe plate. Davis trigger, naturally.

IMG_4793-1.jpg


More of a old style buck-horn rear sight. A tung oil finish with paste wax finish. The flintlock has Minwax Rosewood stain. The cap lock has Golden Oak.

IMG_4795-1.jpg


Replaced front sight. And most of all the 32”, 1/70 ROT Green Mountain barrel.

IMG_4794-1.jpg


Well you say, “It's no longer a Thompson Center Hawkin.” :grin: So be it, but they are my version and they are mine! :wink:
They both were kits, BTW. :applause:
 
How do they function ? Meaning how's the spark and balance.....I like what you've done....especally the flinter. I might have scratched the shinny metal and used black iron. Eliminated the patchbox altogether....then it'd be my version :rotf:
 
Very nice work! I haven't done the extra work you have, but there aren't many of mine that still have factory 1:48" barrels. They're either GMs or TC Custom shop with the appropriate ROT or smoothbores.

While we're on the subject of what TC should have done, add .54 in 15/16" barrels and .58 and .62 in the 1" barrels.
 
Well, since by your own admission they're no longer actually TC's, I think from now on we should just call them "Biggs Rifles"...

Eric
 
IMHO T/C should have gone to an auction house and bought a good example of a flintlock rifle from some historical period - Rev War, 1812, fur trade, whichever - and copied the physical style but applied their modern investment casting and electron-beam welding techniques to the mechanical design.

whaiif.jpg
 
Circulate this, even send it to TC! I wonder what they'd say if they got about 2,000 orders. :rotf:

Stumpkiller said:
IMHO T/C should have gone to an auction house and bought a good example of a flintlock rifle from some historical period - Rev War, 1812, fur trade, whichever - and copied the physical style but applied their modern investment casting and electron-beam welding techniques to the mechanical design.

whaiif.jpg
 
I posted that here on April 1st about six years ago.

Just think if Warren Center actually used a Hawken or a J.P. Henry as his pattern and followed it closely. Or even a M1803.

For all sad words of tongue and pen, The saddest are these, 'It might have been'.

-- John Greenleaf Whittier
 
No kidding! And he influenced lots of other designs with that choice.

I have an Investarms 58 cal Hawken from the early days of the TC Hawken, and you have to look twice to make sure it's not a TC, right down to the brass trim and patch box. With its 15/16" barrel it's lots lighter, and thankfully differs from the TC in one important regard. Its comb is lower and doesn't bite my cheekbone, even with heavier recoil. I can only imagine what it would look like if Investarms wasn't trying so hard to imitate Warren Center's brainstorm.
 
Nice work on the T/Cs Ernie. :thumbsup:





BrownBear said:
I have an Investarms 58 cal Hawken from the early days of the TC Hawken, and you have to look twice to make sure it's not a TC, right down to the brass trim and patch box.
... I can only imagine what it would look like if Investarms wasn't trying so hard to imitate Warren Center's brainstorm.

A GPR. :wink:
 
Jethro224 said:
BrownBear said:
I have an Investarms 58 cal Hawken from the early days of the TC Hawken, and you have to look twice to make sure it's not a TC, right down to the brass trim and patch box.
... I can only imagine what it would look like if Investarms wasn't trying so hard to imitate Warren Center's brainstorm.

A GPR. :wink:

But dang.... They didn't get around to a 58 cal GPR before the world switched to 1" barrels. Now THAT is my dream GPR!

Hmmmmmmm. Wait a minute. Tangs match.... Ummm, swap out the brass ramrod pipes and maybe adjust the under rib. It's got a single wedge, but....

Aw man.... I think I'll just leave the barrel where it is! :idunno:
 
Stumpkiller said:
IMHO T/C should have gone to an auction house and bought a good example of a flintlock rifle from some historical period - Rev War, 1812, fur trade, whichever - and copied the physical style but applied their modern investment casting and electron-beam welding techniques to the mechanical design.

:dead: Haven't we killed this sorry beast yet?
 

Latest posts

Back
Top