Bluegrass
36 Cal.
- Joined
- May 17, 2004
- Messages
- 92
- Reaction score
- 40
Rant-ON
Have you ever noticed how it seems like the major gun magazines(Shooting times,American Rifleman,Guns & Ammo) don't even know traditional frontstuffers exist? :curse: I'm an NRA member, so I get American Rifleman, and I'm a subscriber to Shooting Times. The only time I can remeber seeing an article on traditional smokepoles was in a Field & Stream from the early '90s.
I just got in the latest Shooting Times today and I see this article, its title reads "10 tips for getting along with your in-line muzzleloader." :curse: :no: :shake: :: What a load of manure! How about an article titled "10 reasons to buy a side lock insted of an in-line." :thumbsup: That's more like it! ::
And the part that really stinks is that, in my opinion, the NMLRA charges way too much to join. If you can get a year of Shooting Times for 20 bucks, why can't you get a year of Muzzle Blasts for 20 bucks?
Rant-OFF
Any other opinions yall?
Have you ever noticed how it seems like the major gun magazines(Shooting times,American Rifleman,Guns & Ammo) don't even know traditional frontstuffers exist? :curse: I'm an NRA member, so I get American Rifleman, and I'm a subscriber to Shooting Times. The only time I can remeber seeing an article on traditional smokepoles was in a Field & Stream from the early '90s.
I just got in the latest Shooting Times today and I see this article, its title reads "10 tips for getting along with your in-line muzzleloader." :curse: :no: :shake: :: What a load of manure! How about an article titled "10 reasons to buy a side lock insted of an in-line." :thumbsup: That's more like it! ::
And the part that really stinks is that, in my opinion, the NMLRA charges way too much to join. If you can get a year of Shooting Times for 20 bucks, why can't you get a year of Muzzle Blasts for 20 bucks?
Rant-OFF
Any other opinions yall?