Amikee said:
Yes sir. Dry fired only. It's not mine, but a friend's of mine. He was told this story by one of his relatives. I don't buy it really, because Lorenz (if it is Lorenz) muskets were dressed in iron.
As is this one. Most, but not quite all CW era military firearms were mounted in iron.
Amikee said:
I don't see any rifling in it, no.
Not terribly surprising, the gun was probably reamed smooth for hunting use at the same time the barrel was shortened.
Amikee said:
Ramrod appears to be a simple cut branch, that's about it. There was many Lorenz repros made in 1950s or so, and I personally believe this is one of those reproduction guns, just left in some cellar or barn for quite a few years.
Personally, I have never heard of or seen a reproduction Lorenz from the 1950s or '60s, maybe someone else has? There is currently a badly done reproduction Lorenz that is made by "the usual suspects" in India, but that is all. They started coming out a couple of years ago. The Civil War reenacting community has been begging for a decent quality repop Lorenz for a long time.
Amikee said:
Another thing I realized, it doesn't have any US inspector proof marks, which in my opinion would make sense on importated gun. I send out some emails and photos to few people, so who knows. Perchaps it's a Mississippi and not Lorenz after all.......
It is certainly
not a Mississippi, the Lorenz is only vaguely similar to the brass mounted US M1841 Rifle, it is a shortened Lorenz Rifle Musket, the standard infantry weapon of the Austro-Hungarian Army.
Also, the arms imported during the American Civil War were rarely marked with inspector's or government property marks, no reason to. They had been inspected and stood proof in their nations of origin - England, Austria-Hungary, France, Prussia, etc. And examples were inspected by Confederate, Federal or State purchasing agents at the time of purchase. Some Confederate P53 Enfields were marked but those are nothing like the Lorenz and are very scarce.