• This community needs YOUR help today. We rely 100% on Supporting Memberships to fund our efforts. With the ever increasing fees of everything, we need help. We need more Supporting Members, today. Please invest back into this community. I will ship a few decals too in addition to all the account perks you get.



    Sign up here: https://www.muzzleloadingforum.com/account/upgrades
  • Friends, our 2nd Amendment rights are always under attack and the NRA has been a constant for decades in helping fight that fight.

    We have partnered with the NRA to offer you a discount on membership and Muzzleloading Forum gets a small percentage too of each membership, so you are supporting both the NRA and us.

    Use this link to sign up please; https://membership.nra.org/recruiters/join/XR045103

Drilling a Touch Hole

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Joined
Dec 23, 2023
Messages
48
Reaction score
40
Location
Montague, MA
Hi,

I have a .32 caliber barrel for a kit rifle I was given. i noticed there is no touch hole drilled. So my question is should i drill and tap for a liner to be installed or just drill the appropriate sized touch hole? I have read several comments on this and seems there are mixed opinions on this.

thanks for any input.
 
Do you want best ignition, or a most authentic method? A touch hole liner coned on the inside will improve ignition consistency. It will also look different from originals if you use a stainless steel or ampco liner. Chambers offers plain steel liners, which I prefer. Yes, they need replacement every 5000 shots or so.
 
I think hands down a vent liner is the best way to go. For me it does not matter if the liner is stainless steel, Ampco or just steel as long as I get the best ignition from the liner.
 
i usually just drill a vent hole, then later if ignition is a problem may install a liner.
remember with just a 1/16 vent hole it should be forward of the face of the breach plug a bit. i always drill mine after the lock is inlet so i can adjust fore and aft as needed if needed. initial layout should make it fairly standard, but nothing about a plank build is standard!
 
Install your lock first to locate the correct position for your liner. Most of us use a liner, I like the real Chambers White lightning liners not the TOW version. On a .32 I would use a 1/4" liner and have the edge of the liner just barely off the breech plug face.

https://www.flintlocks.com/parts.htm
I do a lay out like this and drill a 1/16" pilot hole first to make sure tap drill goes in the right place. This is a big barrel, the liner is a 3/8" one.

touch hole locating 002.JPG
 
Last edited:
Old guns often had just a straight hole. That works but will be a little slower than a liner. Above it’s noted that a plain steel liner burns out and has to be replaced after several thousand shots, I don’t shoot that much
Liners were placed in old guns, so not non historic, just not real common.
I’ve shot both and like a liner
There were tricks done on old guns like coneing outside and inside.
My favorite is the white lightning
 
Hi,

I have a .32 caliber barrel for a kit rifle I was given. i noticed there is no touch hole drilled. So my question is should i drill and tap for a liner to be installed or just drill the appropriate sized touch hole? I have read several comments on this and seems there are mixed opinions on this.

thanks for any input.
The trouble with designing a flash hole without a liner is eventially when a liner will be needed the threads will intersect the breech screw. I believe the best way is to plan for an evetially liner body is to design so that it will clear ahead of the breech screw which means the tang mortice and barrel shoulder will have to be set back to account for it allowing a pan center locate.
The flash is going to be a main charge side ingnition anyway even if just ahead of the breech plug and I see no accuracy disadvantage to this as long as it will be below the patched ball seat.
I say this from experience using underhammer percussion match rifles which are virtally all side main charge ignition. I can't tell any difference in accuracy or reliability if the flash hole is just clear of the breech plug or a liner thread width ahead of it.
A side note on flash hole profile, it's not just the inlargement of them that causes issues it's also the irregular way they erode that causes inaccuracy and reliability trouble.
I think in general flash hole profile erosion is tolerated way past when they are effecting accuracy and eventially reliability.
 
The trouble with designing a flash hole without a liner is eventially when a liner will be needed the threads will intersect the breech screw. I believe the best way is to plan for an evetially liner body is to design so that it will clear ahead of the breech screw which means the tang mortice and barrel shoulder will have to be set back to account for it allowing a pan center locate.
The flash is going to be a main charge side ingnition anyway even if just ahead of the breech plug and I see no accuracy disadvantage to this as long as it will be below the patched ball seat.
I say this from experience using underhammer percussion match rifles which are virtally all side main charge ignition. I can't tell any difference in accuracy or reliability if the flash hole is just clear of the breech plug or a liner thread width ahead of it.
A side note on flash hole profile, it's not just the inlargement of them that causes issues it's also the irregular way they erode that causes inaccuracy and reliability trouble.
I think in general flash hole profile erosion is tolerated way past when they are effecting accuracy and eventially reliability.
Thinking on this a bit more about the underhammer ignition example I have to say reliability is better with some space between the breech plug face and the nipple orifice intersection as it has more fouling clearance.
 
Back
Top