According to the new book that is out, about 51" would be even better. :thumbsup:tg said:It would be nice to see some proper thicker French barrels in the 44-48" range as well
When compared to originals, that one needs a quicker taper at the breech, it's about 1 to 1 1/2 lbs too heavy for a period french barrel. It is otherwise a very nice barrel.Rich Pierce said:I have a barrel from R.E. Davis that is terrific. Think it's 48", 20 ga, oct to round, and about 1.25 at the breech. Thin at the muzzle. I just finished rounding the bottom flats with a file.
My information comes from measuring original barrels.talon said:Where would I find imformation on the barrel diamensions that you guys describe? Maybe some pictures also? Thanks.
HVF, A project 15 years in the making.BillinOregon said:Mike: I'm dying to know what style/period of gun you are building with a 72-inch barrel. I'd like a 54-incher for a circa 1650s club-butt fowler.
Mike Brooks said:When compared to originals, that one needs a quicker taper at the breech, it's about 1 to 1 1/2 lbs too heavy for a period french barrel. It is otherwise a very nice barrel.Rich Pierce said:I have a barrel from R.E. Davis that is terrific. Think it's 48", 20 ga, oct to round, and about 1.25 at the breech. Thin at the muzzle. I just finished rounding the bottom flats with a file.
I don't know what a track of the wolf barrel is, they sell about a bilion different barrels.talon said:The light french patteren, is that simular to a track of the wolf barrel just longer?
Enter your email address to join: