I went to the range today with my Ardesa Underhammer to check out some different load combinations for an upcoming competition and realised when I got there that I had packed the wrong size patches. It's a .40 caliber and I use either a .395 swaged RB or a .390 cast RB both with a 20 thou patch. All I had was a pack of 10 thou patches.
Rather than miss the opportunity to shoot I used the 10 thou patches with some surprising results.
The balls started easily without using a mallet and I expected poor groups but amazingly I shot 3 of the best cards ever with a high score of 95 and superb groups.
The general consensus at my range is the thicker the patch the tighter the group and ideally the ball should show signs of weave imprint from the patch.
I picked up a few of the shot patches and there were a couple with minor signs of blow-by but nothing serious.
My question is, was this a fluke or has anyone else an opinion about ball patch fit?
Rather than miss the opportunity to shoot I used the 10 thou patches with some surprising results.
The balls started easily without using a mallet and I expected poor groups but amazingly I shot 3 of the best cards ever with a high score of 95 and superb groups.
The general consensus at my range is the thicker the patch the tighter the group and ideally the ball should show signs of weave imprint from the patch.
I picked up a few of the shot patches and there were a couple with minor signs of blow-by but nothing serious.
My question is, was this a fluke or has anyone else an opinion about ball patch fit?