flintriflesmith
40 Cal.
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2005
- Messages
- 284
- Reaction score
- 0
Rather than take the thread on how many shots we can expect from a modern steel barrel off on a different direction, I want to share a bit about wrought iron rifle barrels.
I have forge welded, bored, rifled, and filled several rifle barrels out of wrought iron. I have also engraved signatures on them. Based on that experience I do not find them at all different in hardness from those modern barrels made out of the leaded screw stock (Getz, Rice, etc.). Wrought iron barrels are noticably softer than those modern barrels made out of the more specialized steels (Rayle, Green Mountian, etc). Wrought iron files and cuts very much like mild steel (1010). It does have silicone inclusions and depending on how well refined it is (more refinded means smaller inclusions) they can cause the iron to load up a file more quickly than steel does. Chalking the file helps with that problem.
I have only know of one wrought iron barrel in modern times to wear to the point where it began to through larger groups. It was shot a bunch with PRB and the ball and patch combo was on he side of "thick patch and small ball" as I personally believe many hunting rifles were in the flint period.
When the groups opened up to about 2 inches at 50 yards we unbreeched the rifle and found that the rifling was very slick but had a sort of rounded over look to the corners of the lands. We cast a freshening slug and cut both the lands and groves about .002". Accuracy was completely restored.
The only time freshening a barrel needs to remove more than a few thousandths is when there has been neglect and rust pitting. No doubt there were cases on neglect in the period especially in cases were a rifle was fired, reloaded and hung on the wall until the next hunt without cleaning.
I also want to share an article I wrote about 18th-century iron and steel. There are lots of myths about the colonial iron industry and how the different types of iron were made and used. To learn more follow this link:
Web Article on 18th-century iron and steel
Gary
I have forge welded, bored, rifled, and filled several rifle barrels out of wrought iron. I have also engraved signatures on them. Based on that experience I do not find them at all different in hardness from those modern barrels made out of the leaded screw stock (Getz, Rice, etc.). Wrought iron barrels are noticably softer than those modern barrels made out of the more specialized steels (Rayle, Green Mountian, etc). Wrought iron files and cuts very much like mild steel (1010). It does have silicone inclusions and depending on how well refined it is (more refinded means smaller inclusions) they can cause the iron to load up a file more quickly than steel does. Chalking the file helps with that problem.
I have only know of one wrought iron barrel in modern times to wear to the point where it began to through larger groups. It was shot a bunch with PRB and the ball and patch combo was on he side of "thick patch and small ball" as I personally believe many hunting rifles were in the flint period.
When the groups opened up to about 2 inches at 50 yards we unbreeched the rifle and found that the rifling was very slick but had a sort of rounded over look to the corners of the lands. We cast a freshening slug and cut both the lands and groves about .002". Accuracy was completely restored.
The only time freshening a barrel needs to remove more than a few thousandths is when there has been neglect and rust pitting. No doubt there were cases on neglect in the period especially in cases were a rifle was fired, reloaded and hung on the wall until the next hunt without cleaning.
I also want to share an article I wrote about 18th-century iron and steel. There are lots of myths about the colonial iron industry and how the different types of iron were made and used. To learn more follow this link:
Web Article on 18th-century iron and steel
Gary