In a moment I will reply to your very helpful posts here, thank you. Before that I have a germane post of my own.
Late this afternoon, in the heavily angled light of the fading sunset, and after a gentle rain earlier in the day that washed the fabric, I finally found several of yesterday's experimental tight-er patches. They stood out like beacons this evening, whereas last night, even with a spotlight, I could find nothing in the same location. And what a lesson they taught me.
On the left are two patches that were nested together under the ball, a pre-cut 0.010" cotton over a 0.018" pillow ticking, for a combined patch thickness of 0.028". Under them was a patch of pillow ticking placed over the powder, as a buffer. The shot on this was on paper, and not too far from the bullseye, but still not accurate. Cutting can be seen on both of these patches, as the gas gets by.
The two patches to the right are pillow ticking that were each coupled with pre-cut 0.015" cotton, for a combined patch thickness of 0.033", for one shot each. Look at those nice patches, they could almost be used over again. And the two shots they delivered were exactly to point of aim, perfect bullseyes, at 75 yards. No gas cutting. No blown up patch material. Perfect accuracy.
So what I learned is that
"blown" patches are too thin. They are blown by the gases blowing past them. Anyone with blown patches needs to greatly increase the thickness of the patch or patch material they are using in their muzzleloader.
Nothing to "read" or study here, if your gun produces blown patches just get thicker patching materials and experiment with layering them together and using them alone.
Forgive me if this is stating the obvious, but it was not obvious to me, and I could not find any definitive statement on it.