• This community needs YOUR help today. We rely 100% on Supporting Memberships to fund our efforts. With the ever increasing fees of everything, we need help. We need more Supporting Members, today. Please invest back into this community. I will ship a few decals too in addition to all the account perks you get.



    Sign up here: https://www.muzzleloadingforum.com/account/upgrades
  • Friends, our 2nd Amendment rights are always under attack and the NRA has been a constant for decades in helping fight that fight.

    We have partnered with the NRA to offer you a discount on membership and Muzzleloading Forum gets a small percentage too of each membership, so you are supporting both the NRA and us.

    Use this link to sign up please; https://membership.nra.org/recruiters/join/XR045103

Question on model 1863 Springfield bolster

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Joined
Jul 15, 2023
Messages
187
Reaction score
209
Location
Va
I am showing my ignorance here, but better safe that sorry. I recently purchased this rifle and while wiping it down, I noticed a line where the bolster connects to the breech.
Is this normal, or was the bolster made as one piece with the breech and this one has cracked?
The rifle is a defarbed reproduction of unknown make.

thanks for any assistance.
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    1.7 MB · Views: 1
  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    1.5 MB · Views: 0
  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    1.2 MB · Views: 0
I’d think that it is poorly made to start with. I recently worked on an original 1856 Enfield and on very close inspection found that the bolster was brazed on. That indicated that it is a good way to make a breech but also shows that a perfect fit and a well executed braze is necessary.
 
Sure looks brazed on to me.

If it were a dangerous way to mount a bolster, I doubt they'd have done it.

That rifle's been rode hard and it hasn't given way.

Stuff it with 60 grains of 2F and a minnie ball and pull the trigger.


PS: I'd still like to know who stamped the bolster with that cannon.
 
That bolster has clearly been brazed (poorly in my opinion) to the side of the barrel. Brass is visible in one photo. The stamp on the bolster is nothing I have ever seen and the shape of the bolster is wrong, rounded edges, etc. There are no manufacturer's marks or proofs on the barrel. It is by some unknown manufacturer.

The N-SSA will not approve any barrel with a brazed on bolster as some were known to have blown off back in the 1960s. The association will not allow any barrel that has not been made by an approved maker and clearly marked to be used in competition. Most Italian makers have approved barrels with the exception of some early ones that had brazed bolsters.

Here are links to 2 earlier discussions of that very gun:

https://www.muzzleloadingforum.com/...ld-real-or-replica.168697/page-2#post-2423071
https://www.muzzleloadingforum.com/threads/barrel-identification.168714/#post-2423134
 
So on original rifles was the bolster forged as part of the barreled receiver? Or was the bolster a separate part that was attached and if so how was it attached?
 

Latest posts

Back
Top