- Joined
- Mar 4, 2013
- Messages
- 297
- Reaction score
- 182
Howdy folks,
Related to Bravo 4-4's thread, but not wanting to hijack his.
Back in 2013, I picked up a pair of Colt's. The ad read:
"A nice pair of Uberti made, repro Colt 1862 Pocket Police models, .36 caliber 5 shot fluted cylinders. One is possibly one of the early ones made for Colt, no box. Has correct Colt markings and no visible Italian markings. This nice little revolver has nickeled back strap. The other one has brass backstrap, purchased from Dixie Gunworks probably 15 yrs ago, no box. I have never fired either of these live, used for blanks one time. Both function well, very good cosmetic condition. Also included is custom made shoulder holster rig. Revolvers will sit just under armpits with grips angled forward, easily pulled in reverse plainsman's twist manner. No particular historical provenance on the holster but very nice looking. Great for bushwacker or civilian nar-do-well impression."
I picked up the lot, as the seller was the same size as me, so the holster fit.
My question relates to the first pistol. I never really gave it much thought, but now I'm wondering if it may really be one of the 2nd or 3rd gen guns. Did they make them in multiple models, or "just" the 1860? I'm having difficulty getting photos that show the markings.
Mechanically, both pistols are equally reliable. Both are more accurate then I am, and from my perspective, both hit just a little high. I haven't miced them to see if there's any difference in the bores or chambers - both give a nice lead ring using .375 ball. The "Colt's" rammer is cut for conicals, while the "Uberti's" is the more familiar roundball, but that's the only difference, other than lack of modern marking on the one and the backstrap/trigger guard material. Ironically though, they prefer different brands of caps...
Thanks,
Mike
Related to Bravo 4-4's thread, but not wanting to hijack his.
Back in 2013, I picked up a pair of Colt's. The ad read:
"A nice pair of Uberti made, repro Colt 1862 Pocket Police models, .36 caliber 5 shot fluted cylinders. One is possibly one of the early ones made for Colt, no box. Has correct Colt markings and no visible Italian markings. This nice little revolver has nickeled back strap. The other one has brass backstrap, purchased from Dixie Gunworks probably 15 yrs ago, no box. I have never fired either of these live, used for blanks one time. Both function well, very good cosmetic condition. Also included is custom made shoulder holster rig. Revolvers will sit just under armpits with grips angled forward, easily pulled in reverse plainsman's twist manner. No particular historical provenance on the holster but very nice looking. Great for bushwacker or civilian nar-do-well impression."
I picked up the lot, as the seller was the same size as me, so the holster fit.
My question relates to the first pistol. I never really gave it much thought, but now I'm wondering if it may really be one of the 2nd or 3rd gen guns. Did they make them in multiple models, or "just" the 1860? I'm having difficulty getting photos that show the markings.
Mechanically, both pistols are equally reliable. Both are more accurate then I am, and from my perspective, both hit just a little high. I haven't miced them to see if there's any difference in the bores or chambers - both give a nice lead ring using .375 ball. The "Colt's" rammer is cut for conicals, while the "Uberti's" is the more familiar roundball, but that's the only difference, other than lack of modern marking on the one and the backstrap/trigger guard material. Ironically though, they prefer different brands of caps...
Thanks,
Mike