Touchholes create more arguments over less than any other aspect of flintlock design. Many are drilled 3/32". Others claim 1/16". And, then there the fans of the wider 5/64" holes. I drilled mine out to 5/64" a while back when I was still having trouble with the 1/16" hole in damp weather. I have had no misfires with the touch hole enlarged to 5/64".
Now, the differences in this argument represent 3/64", not really much when you think about it. I believe that the touch hole location in relation to the pan is more important than the differences between these three size holes. The hole needs to be above a line drawn across the top of the pan. That allows air to exist under the hole, so that the heat of the flame goes into the hole, and is not above it.
As a matter of long practice, I sitll bank my priming powder away from the touch hole to give extra air next to the hole to draw the flame to that " free oxygen " . Its the heat, and not the fire that ignites the powder, and I have found that banking the powder away from the hole speeds up ignition.
I do believe that an inside coned liner contributes to speedy ignition, too, simply because it allows the heat to contact more granules of powder, and then reflects the heat of the burning charge back toward the chamber to raise chamber pressures and speed the burning of the main charge. A parabolic cone does this better than a straight walled cone. Outside coned liners will move the prime closer to the main charge, but the distance to be traveled is so small that I don't believe this contributes very much to ignition speed.
Paul