• This community needs YOUR help today. We rely 100% on Supporting Memberships to fund our efforts. With the ever increasing fees of everything, we need help. We need more Supporting Members, today. Please invest back into this community. I will ship a few decals too in addition to all the account perks you get.



    Sign up here: https://www.muzzleloadingforum.com/account/upgrades
  • Friends, our 2nd Amendment rights are always under attack and the NRA has been a constant for decades in helping fight that fight.

    We have partnered with the NRA to offer you a discount on membership and Muzzleloading Forum gets a small percentage too of each membership, so you are supporting both the NRA and us.

    Use this link to sign up please; https://membership.nra.org/recruiters/join/XR045103

Early flintlocks

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

musketman

Passed On
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Messages
10,651
Reaction score
46
Early in firearm history, before the flintlocks, were the SNAPHAUNCES...

These were the forerunner to the flintlock and the snaphaunce replaced the wheel-lock as an ignition system.

Iron-Pyrate was held in the holding arm which struck the tooth face of the frizzen and created sparks...
The main difference between snaphaunces and flintlocks were the frizzen and primming pan cover of the snaphaunces are two seperate peices, unlike the single piece of the flintlocks that exposed the primming charge to the sparks once fired.

Moorish snaphaunces are mostly .62 caliber, long barreled guns held by six barrel bands.
 
Screenshot_20240307-165810~2.png
 
Please help me understand what source says they used pyrite?

The Spanish 'Miquelet' lock also pre-dated the true French-type flintlock and was another flint ignited fire lock. Other lock types pre-dating the flintlock were the English lock, then followed by the doglock.

But otherwise there are other differences, like how the cock is part of the tumbler, or how the snaphaunce had a horizontal sear and not a vertical sear; and that they had incredibly strong springs due to the infancy of the flint production at that time, amongst other differences too.
 
Back
Top