Is there a decernably difference between dry patch and greased/oil patch,
I can't answer that directly from personal experience but here is what I did observe. Two .54 caliber rifles. One a 28" TC and one a 32" GPR. Same load (100 grs ff), same patch, same lube, same ball, same day, same chrono, same shooter, bore wiped between shots. The 28" TC shot about 100 fps faster than the 32" GPR.
The only discernable difference between the two was that the TC had a tighter bore. This was easily noticed when loading. It was clearly a tighter load in the TC than in the GPR. Even with four additional inches of barrel, the GPR was still out shot in the velocity department.
I must disagree with Paul in his conclusions regarding burning patches. Using the soluble oil "dry patches" has never resulted in patch burning for me. I find that I
must wipe the bore after every shot with my dry patches. Otherwise, they are near impossible to load.
I shoot tight patch ball combos :shocked2: Those same combos can be shot with
no lube, simply cut and loaded dry (no water soluble lube either) and shot without burning patches. They are very difficult to load that way.
Those same combos load much more easily with grease lube (I still wipe between shots) and with "wet" lubes such as Hoppes, dish soap and water or spit. With wet lubes, those same combos will shoot all day without wiping.
To accurately answer your original query, one could shoot a tight combo such as mine with no lube, dry patch, grease patch and spit say five or 10 shots each and measure the chrono results to get to your answer.
For most on this board it would seem like a waste of time to pursue such a question, but I think it might be fun.