So here is an image of a newspaper report from 1829 where at least one fellow died after eating Hunters Pudding....,
Now the question is..., was this murder, or accident?
The proper ingredients for the Hunter's Pudding are listed within the article.
Did the water have the deadly substance, and transferred it to the pudding OR did the pudding have the deadly substance, and transferred some of it to the water?
I wonder how long it took for somebody to take a sample of the water? Would they have kept the water in the kettle after boiling a pudding? Nobody else got sick from any food made after the party got ill.
LD
Now the question is..., was this murder, or accident?
The proper ingredients for the Hunter's Pudding are listed within the article.
Did the water have the deadly substance, and transferred it to the pudding OR did the pudding have the deadly substance, and transferred some of it to the water?
I wonder how long it took for somebody to take a sample of the water? Would they have kept the water in the kettle after boiling a pudding? Nobody else got sick from any food made after the party got ill.
LD