• This community needs YOUR help today. We rely 100% on Supporting Memberships to fund our efforts. With the ever increasing fees of everything, we need help. We need more Supporting Members, today. Please invest back into this community. I will ship a few decals too in addition to all the account perks you get.



    Sign up here: https://www.muzzleloadingforum.com/account/upgrades
  • Friends, our 2nd Amendment rights are always under attack and the NRA has been a constant for decades in helping fight that fight.

    We have partnered with the NRA to offer you a discount on membership and Muzzleloading Forum gets a small percentage too of each membership, so you are supporting both the NRA and us.

    Use this link to sign up please; https://membership.nra.org/recruiters/join/XR045103

The Lead Business in North America

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Guest
The Lead Business in North America

Editors note: some spelling is from the time period.

Lead or pewter articles were in everyday use when European first arrived in the New World and in a short period of time was passed on to the local Indians as gifts or used as barter in a trade. The introduction of the firearm made lead an extremely important trade item and would continue for centuries in the settlements, forts, trading posts and on the frontier.

In the seventeenth, eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, guns for trade were not standardized and became customary for one to buy a mold with the purchase of the gun. Sites in New York and western Pennsylvania dating from 1660-87 have produced single cavity ball molds, bar lead - some crude flat bars with stamped lettering, yet others found with beveled edges with raised lettering where fancy for the time, weighting from a small 6-7 oz (HBC C. bar) to the heavy 2 pound bars.

Hudson's Bay Company records list large shipments of shot to Hudson's Bay in the period 1687-1740, then again in the 1763-1791 time frame, included in the later shipments were three sizes of bars marked [HBC a.], [HBC b.], and the small [HBC c.] bar. The "a." bar was usually moved to forts or settlements close to water travel do to its weight of 65-75 pounds (referred to as a "pig of lead"), used for ballast in the bottom of ships and then melted into smaller bars for the trade, "b" bars where of the 20-25 pounds size and have been found inland, probably carried by horse or smaller water craft such as a canoe or flat bottom boat, and again melted to a smaller size. The [HBC c.] bar - the most popular because of its size (6-7 oz), perfect to be carried in ones equipage, found in possible bags with a single ball mold - seen in a number of museums throughout North America, probably due to it's size and availability for such a long period.

[SEE NOTE]

Small brass molds for a variety of sizes of shot, and round ball were common among the settlers and some eventually passed to the Indians. In1648 Bradford wrote from the Plymouth Plantation, "They [the Indians] have also their moulds to make shotte, of all sorts, as Musket bullets, pistoll bullets, swane and gose shotte, and smaler sorts;....."

By 1750 the trade had spread around the Great Lakes and into central Canada, with standardized guns like the Northwest gun, molded balls began to become more popular than molding one's own and the supply of bar lead slowed leaving the shot as the big money maker in the business. Molded bars were still a significant trade item in many of the colonies and on the frontier as more manufacturers now in the trade produced smoothbore and rifled guns, now coming from Europe and American firms, individual molds and bar lead still had to be purchased.

In 1755 Sir William Johnson wrote to Colden and Kerly:

"SINCE MY LAST, I HAVE GOT UP THE GUNS YOU SENT ME, WHICH WILL NOT ANSWER AT ALL, INSTEAD OF BEING LIGHT INDIAN GUNS AS I WROTE FOR, I FIND THEY ARE OLD MUSKETS VAMPED UP ANEW. SO LARGE AND WIDE A BORE THE INDIANS NEVER USE, NEITHER WOULD THEY CARRY THEM IF THEY WERE TO BE PAID NEVER SO MUCH FOR IT. SO I RETURN THEM TO YOU, IN ORDER TO CHANGE THEM FOR LIGHT GUNS, IF YOU CAN, IF NOT I DON'T WANT THEM."

Johnson wrote Governor Clinton that his stores of materials for the Indians were extremely limited. He requested material for coats, ruffled shirts, "20 caster[beaver]hats with scallop lace, a parcell of "bullet moulds" for casting ball & swan shot. There were several requests made for the parcell of "bullet moulds" for casting ball & swan shot over a lengthy period while Sir William Johnson was in charge of operations in dealing with the Iroquois trade.

It was recorded in 1792; "Americans have met a delegation of Chickasaws and Choctaws at Cumberland. They gave the Indians a few lead bars because they had no ball with them and ,due to a lack of any muskets, gave rifles to three principal chiefs." When the Spaniards read the report they where upset and planned to stop any other trades of this type in the area, nothing was found as to the out come of the problem - whether the Spaniards and the Americans met or sent word to each other after the original meeting.

By 1830 the lead mining and smelting industry was well developed turning out lead in large pigs weighting generally about 65-75 pounds, stacked and ready for shipment up and down the Mississippi and Missouri rivers. Employees hired by the year at these ports would cut up the pigs and mold then into trade balls and small bar lead in their spare time, thus helping to fill the demand of travelers on these rivers moving west.

Trade balls were cast in iron, bronze or brass gang molds - by 1850 there were seven gang molds for balls and one brass or bronze mold for buckshot on the inventory at many of the forts, Fort Union employees bragged at the speed that they could turn out ball and shot.

The Chouteau packing account for the "loway Outfit" in 1831 included:
1 lead mold for 12 bars lead............$4.50

2 pigs lead 140 at 3 cts................$4.20

As late as 1870 James Willard Schultz wrote of selling "Number Thirty balls" in cloth bags to the Blackfeet. As late as1883 the Baltinmore and St. Louis Shot Towers were still offering 1/2 ounce balls of .52 caliber. Reports and shipping records up into the early 1900's show a small but steady supply of shot and ball still finding it's way into the wilderness.

At the Hanna-White cabin near Ten Sleep in the Big Horn mountains of Wyoming was found bar lead with dates of 1880, one bar at the Museum of the Fur Trade from that site is marked "E.W. Blatchford & Co. Chicago". Eliphalet Blatchford began business in St. Louis in 1850, he was known for stamping the customer's name on each bar of lead, like Charley Hanson would says, "an excellent advertising scheme".

I think we have explored the lead shot, lead ball and bar lead enough to give you an idea that this was in large demand for a long period in North America from the start of the Colonies through the Fur Trade and into the early 1900's, a longer period than most would think of.

Now let take a look at a few of the Shot Towers, their operators and a little history without being to boring.

Early shot towers where found in the New England states in the early 18th century and flourished in New York and western Pennsylvania. By 1809 John Maclot built the first shot tower west of Pittsburgh and had it in operation the same year. In 1810 Moses Austin, originator of the plan to colonize Texas, built another shot tower at Herculaneum, by 1814 a third tower appeared with the construction completed by Chris and John Honey.

The Saint Louis Shot Tower: As St. Louis' industries grew and the town was exploding with population along with outlining settlements involved with the Westward Movement, it was only natural that a shot tower was needed to fill the demand. Ferdinand Kennett saw the chance for an enterprising person to become wealthy and with partners like his brother Luther and James White it wasn't long that his dream was fulfilled. By 1836 the Saint Louis Shot Tower Company had purchased the J.H. Alford Company, it's warehouse and shot tower in Herculaneum and by 1840 formed a partnership with John Latty to make shot and form a new company - F. Kennett & Company.

KENNETT, SIMONDS & CO. "WHO WILL KEEP A CONSTANT SUPPLY OF PATENT AND BUCK SHOT AND SMALL BAR LEAD ON HAND AND WILL FILL ORDERS UPON SHORTEST NOTICE. THE OFFICE OF THE COMPANY WILL BE KEPT AT THE COUNTING ROOM OF JOHN SIMONDS, 24 WATER ST., ST. LOUIS. JAN 31, 1849" notice seen in the Missouri Republication.

The company had become a copartner ship as it expanded with several silent and named partners, by 1854 Ferdinand Kennett had completed his dream and retired an exceptionally successful man.

The St. Louis Shot Tower supplied large quantities of lead shot, trade balls, and small lead bars to the frontier, mentioning firms like Chouteau, Merle and Sanford, and Chouteau and Valle. A number of one pound lead bars, parts of lead bars and the 1/2 pound lead bars have been found in present day Nebraska, Wyoming and Colorado

In a five month period the shot tower was capable of producing :

......79,775 bags or

......1,994,375 pounds of varied sizes of shot and round balls.

......1714 bags or

......428,460 pounds of lead bars. A total of shot and lead in five months of:......2,422,835 pounds

The Youle Shot Tower: The Youle Shot Tower was built around 1830 on the banks of the East River, beyond Kip's Bay on Manhattan Island in the state of New York, the owner George Youle is listed as a dry goods merchant and builder of the shot tower in Longworth's New Directory for 1835-1836.

The shot tower operated for years and was quite productive, selling much of its inventory to hardware and sporting goods dealers in New York and Pennsylvania. In turn the dealers supplied the Indian Bureau, the American Fur Trade and a number of suppliers in the south and west. One of those suppliers being the Tryon Company of Phila. PA, the same manufacturer of the Tyron trade gun and Tryon rifle, along with cutting tools and general hardware.

When one considers the small size of the product manufactured and compares the sizes of the building and lofty tower devoted to its operation, the proportions are greatly distorted. The apparatus was merely a plate of copper with a number of holes punched in it and placed a few feet above a kettle of water in the tower, the melted lead was poured, descended and passing through the holes in the plate into the water, cooled and hardened all in one operation. Probably the hardest part of the manufacturing of shot was moving the material from the ground to the top of the tower and into the furnaces at that location, many accidents have been recorded at this area, thus workers in the upper part of the tower received more for their daily wage than those working at ground level. The idea of a shot tower as a monument was never found to have the same attraction as those towers of light-houses or ones found at stone forts on the frontier, a shot tower was a place of unbelievable heat, hard work and bad air to breathe.

Still operating in New York as late as 1868 where three shot towers, but the new "wind Tower" method, using a short fall against a blast of cool air soon made them obsolete. This new process was patented in 1848 by T.O. Leroy & Co. of New York and by 1873 they where the only surviving shot tower in New York.

* NOTE: I purchased an original [HBC c.] mold appr.. 1750-1800 period, a [HBC] (overstamp) mold app.. 1800-1835/40, and a "St. Louis Shot Tower" mold app.. 1830-1850. I went into the bar lead business, selling to dealers and retail customers, then something happened that our forefather's didn't have to deal with - the EPA let me know I was against policy for the area I was manufacturing in. Wanting to keep the original molds for my personal collection I had a friend make a new set from the originals and have now sold the reproduction set of molds.

SOURCES:

The Museum Of The Fur Trade Quarterly Vol.29, No.3 Buck & Ball Molds for Indians - Charles E. Hanson, Jr.

The Museum Of The Fur Trade Quarterly Vol.32, No.2 American Trade Goods - Charles E. Hanson, Jr.

The Museum Of The Fur Trade Quarterly Vol.9, No.2 More On The St. Louis Shot Tower - The Engages

The Museum Of The Fur Trade Quarterly Vol.10, No.4 The Youle Shot Tower - Charles E. Hanson, Jr.

The Museum Of The Fur Trade Quarterly Vol.14, No.3 Lead In The Fur Trade - Charles E. Hanson, Jr.

The Museum Of The Fur Trade Quarterly Vol.22, No.3 A Lead Bar From The Hanna-White Cabin - Miles Gilbert & Wayne Rogoski

The Museum Of The Fur Trade Quarterly Vol.3, No.3 The St. Louis Shot Tower - Charles E. Hanson, Jr.
 
buck:
Just wondering.

Is all of this your work or is it from a copyrighted publication?

I ask because one of the Forum rules reads:

"Do not post copyrighted material. You may post a small excerpt, with a link to the original, but you may not post the entire article."
 
Zonie said:
buck:
Just wondering.

Is all of this your work or is it from a copyrighted publication?

These are articles I have written over the years, yes they are copyrighted under my name and several others I have used when writing for different magazines years ago. Some of the old stuff dates all the way back to 1975 in some cases. If I use a statement from someone else it will be mark as doing so with their name and article title shown and usually that statement will be high lighted, put in bold or something to make it stand out. Hope that answers your concerns, have all ready explained this to Claude.

Articles have been seen in a number of publications; "On the Trail", "Backwoodsman", "Tomahawk & Long Rifle", "Black Powder Report", "Buckskin Report", "Poke & Stroke" magazines, Smoke & Fire News" also found in "The Colonial Society", and the "Colorado Collectors" journals. Started writing as a columnist for "Buckskinner" magazine before they went bye bye.
 
I had posted questions on the forum re rifle balls a few months ago.
(can't find it now since Search doesn't work)
I wish you had been able to read it.

Since then a few more questions popped up.
Hopefully you may be able to answer or elaborate.

*) Were there only a few "basic" size balls generally carried in stock?

Ex. it seems I have seen referenced in several period books the mysterious term "Trade Ball".
Reference made it sound like it was used like we now say AA Battery.
As best I can determine is that this was a ball of one half oz. or 32 gauge or approximately 0.526"
Exact words were "Half ounce Trade Ball"
Also, maybe 2/3 oz or 24 gauge or 0.579"
and
3/4 oz or 12 gauge or 0.729

Of course nobody then knew anything about 0.526".
There were no measuring devices like micrometers of this accuracy.
All they knew was balls per pound or gauge.

*) Were barrels bored and then a mold or was a mold made (or commonly avilable ball selected) and a barrel bored to fit?
Seems like bore size is easier to tweek adjust than ball mold size.

*) What would have been a reasonable size tolerance of pre-made balls back then.
I wonder if a rifle owner could do like we now do and say "gosh, that's a little undersized. Next time I'll buy balls 0.005 bigger. Or get some patching 0.005 thicker" :wink:

*) Would they have made rifle size balls by the drop method rather than casting?

*) If so did they drop, then just sort to various gauge sizes. What would the "roundness" tolerance be for dropped balls?

*) Re: the nomenclature of "balls per pound"

Was the convention to be referring to the ball or bore?

Ex. "32 balls per pound"
Was the bore expected to be (excuse the precise value here) 0.526 or was the ball expected to be 0.526
Or was everything pretty much "about that size" and the important issue being that the ball fit inside the barrel with a little bitty room to spare. You making up the difference by testing various patch materials like leather, cloth, blanket.

You seem to have a lot of expertise so am interested in your input.
 
Bob Krohn said:
I had posted questions on the forum re rifle balls a few months ago.
(can't find it now since Search doesn't work)
I wish you had been able to read it.

All you have to do is browse the topics you created. Since there are only 12, it should be easy to find the post you're looking for. In the right hand column, there is an option titled "My Topics", just click it.

Or you can do a Boolean search and look for something unique in your post. I believe this was covered in this thread.
http://www.muzzleloadingforum.com/fusionbb/showtopic.php?tid/236147
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Buck
Thanks for the information.

I'm sure I speak for the members here when I say thank you for sharing your knowledge and your articles with us.
They are very interesting. :hatsoff:
 
Thank you friend, I started writing and keeping journals years ago, then came the computer age and all the research I had done and found interesting of others were loaded. That's the reason in a couple of days I was able to copy paste the number of things provided.

Some of the guys may think I'm bragging, I'm not. I have been very lucky to follow my dreams but at a price, couple of divorces and lost friendships. Personally I want to experience it the way it was and feel what those that went before us felt. Sounds good doesn't it, believe me some of the outings have been pure hell.

On an AMM event on First of the Year 1986 it was -20 not counting the wind, that one cost be the feeling in all my toes. Another ended with back operation when a horse blew up and put me into a tree. The list goes on, but we tried our best to do those treks, encampments as we had read they would have been done.

Its surprising what folks have gotten done in this sport and how well they were prepared. If the shi.. hits the fan I want to be with you guys, we'll survive when others won't. :bow:
 
Back
Top