• This community needs YOUR help today. We rely 100% on Supporting Memberships to fund our efforts. With the ever increasing fees of everything, we need help. We need more Supporting Members, today. Please invest back into this community. I will ship a few decals too in addition to all the account perks you get.



    Sign up here: https://www.muzzleloadingforum.com/account/upgrades
  • Friends, our 2nd Amendment rights are always under attack and the NRA has been a constant for decades in helping fight that fight.

    We have partnered with the NRA to offer you a discount on membership and Muzzleloading Forum gets a small percentage too of each membership, so you are supporting both the NRA and us.

    Use this link to sign up please; https://membership.nra.org/recruiters/join/XR045103

Testshooting an original Colt 1860 Army vs Uberti 1860 Army

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Cool!

The guy claimed the 1860 Army had an inch longer barrel than the Dragoon. I thought the Dragoon had a 7 1/2" barrel vs an 8" barrel for the Army?

He also stated that the Army could handle the same amount of powder. I thought the Dragoon held up to 50 grains and a RB vs something like 35-40 grns plus a RB for the Army? And the Walker holding 60 grns plus a RB...
 
Fantastic. :bow: Great to see that old timer still going. I noticed he said there was some kind of damage to two of the chambers. That's too bad. :(

rodwha, I believe you are correct on all counts. Seems there are always a few tidbits of erroneous info in even the best vids. :idunno:
 
Back
Top