• This community needs YOUR help today. We rely 100% on Supporting Memberships to fund our efforts. With the ever increasing fees of everything, we need help. We need more Supporting Members, today. Please invest back into this community. I will ship a few decals too in addition to all the account perks you get.



    Sign up here: https://www.muzzleloadingforum.com/account/upgrades

Superfine powder difference?

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Early. Don't believe what some will tell you, it's armchair history.

THE SOUTH CAROLINA GAZETTE
June 11, 1741
Loaf Sugar, Gun Powder in half Barrels FF and FFF, Bullets, Strouds, Indian Trading Guns, Mens and Boys Felt Hats

Spence
Thank you.
This thread has had me thinking of your post of your old can of Superfine powder.
I thought I saved some of the pics posted in the replies but I can't find them.
 
Unfortunately, unlike most of the threads on this forum, this one has probably done more to confuse the OP than help. Some answers are correct. e.g. the word "superfine" is not a granulation designation, it is a marketing term. For an experienced bp user just looking at the powder can reveal it's granulation size. As for 4Fg in a main charge, I wouldn't do it.
 
I have a 1 lb can of Dupont superfine rifle black powder. One person said it was possibly the same as 4f ?
Does anyone know if it can safely be used in place of 2f or 3f?
4f will burn faster than 2f by comparison releasing the same energy, just faster. I would back it off by 1/6th if I was trying. IE, if normally shoot 60, back off to 50.
 
image.jpg
 
All the posts very interesting. However I stand by my statement that in
the period gunpowder was offered in two grades, Course and Fine.
Spence 10 refers to a notice in the South Carolina Gazette of June 11,
1741 that refers to f grades being sold by half barrel. I would like to
know what Index was used to locate that? Not doubting it, but that
was not the "trade gunpowder of the day." I'm unable to find the
source of Spence's quote.
 
Last edited:
4f will burn faster than 2f by comparison releasing the same energy, just faster. I would back it off by 1/6th if I was trying. IE, if normally shoot 60, back off to 50.
If you throw it by weight in grains the charges will be identical in energy. The charges will bulk different. Some will get all technical with air space between kernels of powder more burning area on bigger kernels Yadda yadda. But a pound of black powder of a given quality is a pound regardless of kernel size. Don’t quote me I just know that from reading.
 
All the posts very interesting. However I stand by my statement that in
the period gunpowder was offered in two grades, Course and Fine.
Spence 10 refers to a notice in the South Carolina Gazette of June 11,
1741 that refers to f grades being sold by half barrel. I would like to
know what Index was used to locate that? Not doubting it, but that
was not the "trade gunpowder of the day." I'm unable to find the
source of Spence's quote.
Spence has a truly VAST data base of period newspapers and advertising. Everything from trade items coming in by ship and where they will be sold to runaway ads and short news articles.
Be careful what you ask him for, it can be like asking a Sicilian grandmother for more to eat,,,,,, you may get more than you can digest.
 
Here's what's on my can. Sides just have a painted-on label that says superfine gunpowder. Nowhere is an FF number. I have no idea when or where I got this can, so you can see why I am reluctant to use it. I really appreciate you all's help.

The reason I'm asking is, I'm all out of the 3F I had. All I have left is a full pound of 777. So can someone give me the correlation between 777 and 2f or 3f ? I don't shoot a lot as up to last Saturday the only place I can only shoot is in my backyard range out to 125 yards. Saturday I found a new range just 20 miles from my home with a range out to 1000 yards, and it's set up for gongs all the way out. Now my next question is how far out can I accurately shoot with a 50 cal. Hawkin?
I gave my 45/70 to my Son in law cause It wasn't doing me any good out to just 125 yds. Naturally, he just wants to keep It.
Thanks, OB One

IMG_0530.jpeg
IMG_0529.jpeg
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0529.jpeg
    IMG_0529.jpeg
    93 KB · Views: 19
Last edited:
Here's what's on my can. Sides just have a painted-on label that says superfine gunpowder. Nowhere is an FF number. I have no idea when or where I got this can, so you can see why I am reluctant to use it. I really appreciate you all's help.

The reason I'm asking is, I'm all out of the 3F I had. All I have left is a full pound of 777. So can someone give me the correlation between 777 and 2f or 3f ? I don't shoot a lot as up to last Saturday the only place I can only shoot is in my backyard range out to 125 yards. Saturday I found a new range just 20 miles from my home with a range out to 1000 yards, and it's set up for gongs all the way out. Now my next question is how far out can I accurately shoot with a 50 cal. Hawkin?
I gave my 45/70 to my Son in law cause It wasn't doing me any good out to just 125 yds. Naturally, he just wants to keep It.
Thanks, OB One

View attachment 108162
IMG_0529.jpeg
If I recall correctly, the powder granulation size was ink-stamped on the DuPont can in the blank space below the red oval and above the word "Superfine". The designation looks to have been worn off of your can.

I sure wish I would have kept an empty or two of my own from back when.
 
My thinking is this, that the Op has a can of "superfine Black Rifle Powder" without
a sieve designation. Well I know that in times past gunpowder was sold as " C" or "f"
Fine. Course or fine. that is disputed here, but a little time researching will show
I am correct on that. Now was there also gunpowder being sold by grading according
to the 1-4F designation? According to posts here it was. The point is that the Can
is supposed to contain a description of a "Superfine" powder" Early on people
recommended that the OP just shoot it. I said (thinking of the older designations
for fine pistol powder ) that it would be 3-4f. The fact-checkers jumped and this
debate ensued. My major satisfaction is knowing that the OP did not relate to
having a heart attack or incurable cancer, therefore, we will all live to fight another day.
 
Here's what's on my can. Sides just have a painted-on label that says superfine gunpowder. Nowhere is an FF number. I have no idea when or where I got this can, so you can see why I am reluctant to use it. I really appreciate you all's help.

The reason I'm asking is, I'm all out of the 3F I had. All I have left is a full pound of 777. So can someone give me the correlation between 777 and 2f or 3f ? I don't shoot a lot as up to last Saturday the only place I can only shoot is in my backyard range out to 125 yards. Saturday I found a new range just 20 miles from my home with a range out to 1000 yards, and it's set up for gongs all the way out. Now my next question is how far out can I accurately shoot with a 50 cal. Hawkin?
I gave my 45/70 to my Son in law cause It wasn't doing me any good out to just 125 yds. Naturally, he just wants to keep It.
Thanks, OB One

View attachment 108162
IMG_0529.jpeg
What about the underside of the can?
Any markings there?

Also, what does the powder look like. The granulation sizes are visibly different enough to be recognizable by comparison.

20200729_214207.jpg20200729_214110.jpg
Not the best quality pictures but, even with the poor photo quality, one can see the difference between 2f and 3f,,, 4f is much finer and visibly so.

I apologize for forgetting what caliber gun you are using this in, but, honestly, even if the powder in that Dupont can looks finer than the 3d pictured, I would use it.
But, I would start my load work up with a charge 10% lower than your 3f load. If using a 3f load that is on the heavy side, maybe drop another 5 grains lower than that 10% reduction.
 
If you throw it by weight in grains the charges will be identical in energy. The charges will bulk different. Some will get all technical with air space between kernels of powder more burning area on bigger kernels Yadda yadda. But a pound of black powder of a given quality is a pound regardless of kernel size. Don’t quote me I just know that from reading.
You are correct that the total energy is the same. However, the finer grain will burn faster by comparison creating a quicker energy spike that with some firearms could cause an issue. I make my own BP and have played with and tested several times the difference with grainsize and pressures.
 
You are correct that the total energy is the same. However, the finer grain will burn faster by comparison creating a quicker energy spike that with some firearms could cause an issue. I make my own BP and have played with and tested several times the difference with grainsize and pressures.
Nope, if 4f could cause an issue in some firearms then a slight mishap in the loading of said questionable firearm with any powder and thus creat a "spike" in pressure as you put it could also cause an issue.
It is these sweeping comments that completely baffle me. Please submit your evidence, data or facts that substantiate your comment, belief or opinion.
Thank you.
 
Nope, if 4f could cause an issue in some firearms then a slight mishap in the loading of said questionable firearm with any powder and thus creat a "spike" in pressure as you put it could also cause an issue.
It is these sweeping comments that completely baffle me. Please submit your evidence, data or facts that substantiate your comment, belief or opinion.
Thank you.
I get the impression you would not believe my testing results over the last 4 years. I'll quit wasting time now, and not even try
 
J. Paul.
No sir, for more than four years I have been asking for the evidence that using 4f as a main charge normally is dangerous. If indeed it is dangerous and does blow barrels apart please show me.
Why assume I would not believe you?

So, how did you conduct your tests? Where did the barrel fail ? What were the load parameters?
 
Battling against the photos online or the internet is nearly impossible. My mistake was relying on personal experience and having actual items in hand. Found this on the internet so it must be fact - ‘f' stands for "fine" and the sieve that screened it. "Fine pistol powder is a3-4 f pistol powder.’
Maybe an old armament manual may be of use
 
With the markings on the can apparently altered the contents come into question. Does the OP know the origins of the can?, was it sealed,? is it indeed black powder? . An open burn test would help in determining that. Black will flash burn, smokeless much slower. Most smokeless is more grey in color, black is black and a bit shiny. They also have different aromas.
 
I’d be curious what cap and ball guy who experiment have learned. I’ve heard of them using it; though at reduced loads and well compressed which I understand from talking with BP metallic case loaders work with 2 3 and 4. Me I just fill my cartridges with either all powder 2 or 3 or powder and wafers and enough room so the bullet compresses the powder. There is no load data for black powder that I have found
 
Back
Top