You and Phil
You do realize that the cast lead slug you end up with will not be the exact size of your bore? What is your plan to account for that shrinkage?
If you are insistent on getting an exact casting of your bore, why not use Cerrosafe? The stuff is made for doing what you want, getting a chamber casting. As it cools it shrinks a bit (30 minutes), then after 60 minutes grows back to the ‘exact’ size of the chamber it was cast in. It continues to grow a bit over time, but before that occurs one can have taken all the measurements they desire.
There are various products on the market which can be used to make a cast of a gun chamber. To be certain that ...
www.brownells.com
Good suggestions and grist for the mind.I agree that a cold bbl will probably f-up the slug, so I'm abandoning that idea ,I'm thinking I 'need' a bullet that is slightly narrower than the bore, and that a certain amount of shrinkage might be what I need. My present question is about the theoretical diameter of the cast bullet from whatever mold I end up with.I don't remember the clearance of the conical bullets of the Whitworth rifles, but I do remember they are snug, I assume they are slightly under the bore size but how much I don't know. One or two thousandths? I want to cast hexagonal elongated bullets, that fit as hex bullets of this type should. So, for instance, if the bbl is .599 from flat to flat, I have to know what the bullet diameter should be: .590, or .589? I know this will be a heavy bullet, and I have to be careful, and I won't make it very long, not nearly the BC of the original Whitworth boolits. The secondary purpose of the slug is to replicate the twist of the bbl. Guidance, anyone, or will I be winging it in this one? To me, this is very interesting
I’ve slugged dozens of barrels. If you’re going to work from the breech end and hope to drive it out the breech, first examine how a tight patch on a jag exits the breech. It’s very common for the breech plug face to mar the very end of the bore and create a little lip that will mess everything up royally when you drive the slug out the breech end.
I agree the barrel must be very hot to get a good pour with lead. Much too hot to handle.
Not sure I understand why you need an extremely accurate slug ( why a thousandth of an inch of shrinkage matters to anyone). The bore will vary more than that on an old gun.
There is a strong possibility that what you think of as a hexagonal bore is the result of a badly done freshing job during the gun’s lifetime of use. I’ve seen it before. Of course it could be hexagonal but that’s a lot of work for an ordinary rifle.
First, many thank-yous about that common minor breech deformity! Excellent to know! SecGood thinking, but it actually is a hexagonal bore. Think this thought: The slug will be an almost exact copy of the bullets I plan to make, except the bullets will be a few thousandths narrower, as in the original actual Whitworths. It's rate of twist is 1/66 which is too slow to be some kind of legitimate attempt to make a large bore Whitworth.The bore is Very weird looking, concentric swirly looking when I peer down using a tiny light. Def not lands and grooves. This one is so odd that I think I would need to have it examined by an expert just so I could relay his opinion to you guys so you could be convinced. There is a well known muzzleloader gunsmith about 65 miles from me, maybe I should give him a look, but he's already rather ho-hum about my oddity, just to confirm what I already know. The hurried slug I did already create by the pounding-in method was a perfect hex. What I should have asked you guys at the start was, when I do create an elongated bullet, how tightly should it fit (in the Whitworth bullet fashion) or another way to ask is, how many thousandths smaller than the bore should the boolitt be? This question may be for Whitworth experts. Or I may have to figure my own way on this one. Some may ask "Why not just settle for using RBs?" Well to tell the truth I like rifles and anything that goes bang, and I think I'm on a mission.