• This community needs YOUR help today. We rely 100% on Supporting Memberships to fund our efforts. With the ever increasing fees of everything, we need help. We need more Supporting Members, today. Please invest back into this community. I will ship a few decals too in addition to all the account perks you get.



    Sign up here: https://www.muzzleloadingforum.com/account/upgrades
  • Friends, our 2nd Amendment rights are always under attack and the NRA has been a constant for decades in helping fight that fight.

    We have partnered with the NRA to offer you a discount on membership and Muzzleloading Forum gets a small percentage too of each membership, so you are supporting both the NRA and us.

    Use this link to sign up please; https://membership.nra.org/recruiters/join/XR045103

Max loads for short barrels ?

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I believe the Davenport Formula is a guide, and nothing more. Powder type, bullet weight, design, temper (hardness) patch thickness, material, lubricant and pressure applied while loading can all affect how powder burns. For basic roundball rifles up to target guns it is still up to the shooter to define the level of accuracy they are willing to accept and tailor their load accordingly.
This shows a slug rifle I shoot that is .56 caliber. 27 1/2" barrel loaded with a 977 grain paper patched bullet the usual load is 160 grains GOEX Cartridge powder. For distances past 500 yards I use 190 grains. I shoot for accuracy alone. If more powder increases accuracy then to me it is not a waste of powder.
 

Attachments

  • 20220702_144339.mp4
    25.9 MB
Last edited:
It ok to fear what you do not understand.

The davenport formula tell you the maximum powder that can be burnt in your length of barrel.
From there you work backwards to find the best groups charge.

My 45 cal, 42inch Rice barrel can not burn more than 74.5 grs the rest is wasted.
My most accurate groups are at 54.5 grain.
I use the 54.5 gr out to 100 yards, then use the max burn 74.5 grain for up to 150yardsm which is as far as I can see these days.
I was doubling the charge before 109gr, and wasting all the powder. That is what the Davenport Formula is for.

If you are blowing flame, you are wasting powder.
I don’t the formula, I’ve heard of it but never investigated it.
Looking at the Lyman ballistics that while there are diminishing returns there is an increase in velocity in .45s above 75 grains of three f
As I stated above down range higher velocities don’t always work out to better preformance
What exactly does it mean with this formula that that’s a top charge?
 
I believe the Davenport Formula is a guide, and nothing more. Powder type, bullet weight, design, temper (hardness) patch thickness, material, lubricant and pressure applied while loading can all affect how powder burns. For basic roundball rifles up to target guns it is still up to the shooter to define the level of accuracy they are willing to accept and tailor their load accordingly.
This shows a slug rifle I shoot that is .56 caliber. 27 1/2" barrel loaded with a 977 grain paper patched bullet the usual load is 160 grains GOEX Cartridge powder. For distances past 500 yards I use 190 grains. I shoot for accuracy alone. If more powder increases accuracy then to me it is not a waste of powder.
1665028590103.png
 
Yes Lyman found a 70 grain charge produced a MV of 1969 in a 43” barrel, 80-2206, 90 2237, and 100 2367
In a 28” barrel 70 at 1670, 100 at 2008
Down range tells a different story
At 2200 at fifty yards slows to 1615, a hundred 1226
1700 MV yields 1228 at fifty and 952 at a hundred a 27% advantage at the muzzle slows to 22% at fifty yards 19% at a hundred
 

Latest posts

Back
Top