• This community needs YOUR help today. We rely 100% on Supporting Memberships to fund our efforts. With the ever increasing fees of everything, we need help. We need more Supporting Members, today. Please invest back into this community. I will ship a few decals too in addition to all the account perks you get.



    Sign up here: https://www.muzzleloadingforum.com/account/upgrades
  • Friends, our 2nd Amendment rights are always under attack and the NRA has been a constant for decades in helping fight that fight.

    We have partnered with the NRA to offer you a discount on membership and Muzzleloading Forum gets a small percentage too of each membership, so you are supporting both the NRA and us.

    Use this link to sign up please; https://membership.nra.org/recruiters/join/XR045103

Firearms Specialties 1860 Army - sort of

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

kh54

45 Cal.
Joined
Jan 26, 2021
Messages
603
Reaction score
896
Forum member Sourdough started a thread about this unusual revolver a couple of years ago. (R. G. Wilson Revolver. Read this thread for more details.) The oddities such as the grip screw and reversed wedge appear to have been deliberate to allow “reproductions” to be distinguishable from originals. I was told by Jim that as far as he knew Mr. Wilson only made ten of these; mine is serial number 7.

I thought I would repost in the hopes that more information might have surfaced in the past couple of years. I would like to know more about this gun, if anyone has ever seen one of the other nine, and maybe a possible value? I know the last question might be difficult but I’m thinking insurance and eventually selling or trading.

Thoughts anyone?
 

Attachments

  • 7284FAB7-BD2A-46F4-845F-F000C73C48FE.jpeg
    7284FAB7-BD2A-46F4-845F-F000C73C48FE.jpeg
    111.1 KB · Views: 71
Interesting piece, looks nice. I know that in the early days of reproduction guns there was a lot of concern about repro's being passed off as original guns. Some articles in old gun magazines from the period address this. Most of the authors felt there were enough subtle differences (rifling types, metric screws, etx.) to reduce the risk, at least where the factory produced gun were concerned. I can't recall any articles on this particular maker and gun though. There have always been a few talented individuals who made small numbers of reproductions of originals. Some have been virtually identical to original guns (and some few made deliberate fakes, one of the reasons for concern over production replicas). The changes from original on this makers guns would certainly be a distinctive way to differentiate his guns from original ones.
 
Back
Top