You've said this before, and I've pointed out specific examples where it's not true -- specifically in
this thread. One of them now graces the front of my Traditions Crockett rifle. But never mind that, and I know that tapered sight bases as you describe them
have been commonly used throughout the history of dovetail sights.
What I'm curious about is
why you (and others) taper the sight base as you do. I'm not offering any criticism of this, and I'm not saying you shouldn't do it.
But I do wonder what you feel you gain from doing it since a correctly dimensioned and parallel-sided sight base for a given parallel-sided dovetail, will fit more than snugly enough to allow for easy adjustment by drifting in either direction while not risking any movement of the sight in the dovetail under any conditions other than being hit directly as in the case of drifting it for adjustment.
So what do you feel you (and others) gain from tapering the sight base as you do? The only advantage I can see is that it eases insertion of the base in the dovetail -- and I do "chamfer" the ends of the base to accomplish this. But that's different from tapering the base along its entire length from side to side. Just really curious about why this is done.
Or can someone else answer this question for me? Why was this "tapering" practice ever adopted?