• This community needs YOUR help today. We rely 100% on Supporting Memberships to fund our efforts. With the ever increasing fees of everything, we need help. We need more Supporting Members, today. Please invest back into this community. I will ship a few decals too in addition to all the account perks you get.



    Sign up here: https://www.muzzleloadingforum.com/account/upgrades
  • Friends, our 2nd Amendment rights are always under attack and the NRA has been a constant for decades in helping fight that fight.

    We have partnered with the NRA to offer you a discount on membership and Muzzleloading Forum gets a small percentage too of each membership, so you are supporting both the NRA and us.

    Use this link to sign up please; https://membership.nra.org/recruiters/join/XR045103

Design and development of Longrifles

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
He’s sharing his ideas which are great for discussion. I agree with most of his analysis. Other bits, less so. He asserts: “I doubt that one percent of the Kentucky rifles made in the eighteenth century had sliding wooden patch box covers.” The only issue I have is it’s similar to saying that less than 1% of American cars in the 20th century had fins. It’s true, but the range of cars in the 20th century is immense, almost beyond comprehension, from the Model T to the Delorian. Same is true of rifles in the 18th century. There were times and piaces where wooden-patchbox rifles were common, comprising over half of what was being made.
 
Back
Top