• This community needs YOUR help today. We rely 100% on Supporting Memberships to fund our efforts. With the ever increasing fees of everything, we need help. We need more Supporting Members, today. Please invest back into this community. I will ship a few decals too in addition to all the account perks you get.



    Sign up here: https://www.muzzleloadingforum.com/account/upgrades
  • Friends, our 2nd Amendment rights are always under attack and the NRA has been a constant for decades in helping fight that fight.

    We have partnered with the NRA to offer you a discount on membership and Muzzleloading Forum gets a small percentage too of each membership, so you are supporting both the NRA and us.

    Use this link to sign up please; https://membership.nra.org/recruiters/join/XR045103

Conical bullets in a cap and ball revolver

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
My Walker and Euroarms NMA will take .44 Johnston & Dow conicals, though in many revolvers you would need to remove some metal from the frame near the loading port for the gun to accept the longer bullets.

They're good for making historically correct paper cartridges, and hit harder with noticeably more recoil, but in my experience, less accurate than RB.
 
So by this quorum so far, it looks like I should just stay with round ball.
Any accuracy difference from .451 to .454?
 
It all depends upon the revolver, the bullet and the loading technique.
Flat bottom bullets are more susceptible to being made inaccurate because chamber to barrel relative diameters become more important and bullet design must provide suitable fit to the individual revolver.
Round ball is easier to make accurate because it's rounded behind is not subject to being made inaccurate due to improper alignment incurred during loading and the "bullet" design does not depend upon expansion of the bullet base.
 
My Colt Walker has about the same accuracy with the Johnston & Dow as the round ball, but they do hit harder. I like the J&D for making period accurate cartridges as the round balls don't stay in as well. My rammer was designed for conicals so I have less issue with loading these than some makes of replica.
 
I have an Uberti Remington 1858 New Model Army that shoots .454 round balls. I’d like a source for conicals to use in paper cartridges. I use the forming tool from Capandball.com. Anyone use some with this model gun?
 
I found this person and many test for conicals in black powder revolvers on YouTube. I purchased some of his bullets in two weights for my Ruger Old Army.
I found my ruger liked the 240 grn so I purchased a mold from Kaido. I shoot 30 grains of 777 powder or 28 grains of 3F Goex with bullets and a small amount of lube over the bullet. These conicals are made there the driving bands are smaller from the base increasing in size to the end of the bullet which makes for easy loading and centers in cylinder for better groups. You can see a lot of youtube videos from Part 1 to part 6 on roundball, pointed conicals and Kaido's conicals in several different black powder revolvers, velocities, and groups.
I have taken two deer and a pig with these at 20 yards to 35 yards and all did their job they were made for.
Send Kaido an email, which is listed in the videos and he will send you a price list and sizes for different calibers. He still had close to a hundred molds last year for 44 and 36 cal when I purchased my two cavity mold.

Kaido Ojamaa bullets
 
I use and like the Kiado bullet in my Uberti NMA and 60 Army. The 60 needed a little mod to get them to fit. If you take care and load them straight they group quite well. I use the 220 and use beeswax and coconut oil for lube.
 
The military liked conicals for increased stopping power, and probably like was said, they work well with cartridges. Conicals also fell in line with the push in the 1850s to standardize all weapons to a conical type projectile.

However, Skeeter Skelton wrote that Confederate Cavalry vets said round ball put men down better then conicals so I mean, who knows.

I know that I am not yet set up for casting and I have piles of .375 and .454 ball , so, I use what I have.

I have a Pickett mould that I'd like to use for my Walkers , to shoot the correct bullets.
 
A few thoughts on conical's in a cap & ball revolver:

Loading them causes a lot more wear on the loading lever and parts because sheering off a long length of lead is much more difficult than sheering off the small area on a ball. This can cause the parts to fail.

The conical should have a short length at the base that is a smaller diameter than the chamber. This helps to align the bullet with the chamber. Without this pilot, aligning the bullet before ramming it into the chamber is very difficult and ramming it without it being aligned will damage the bullet making it inaccurate.

Usually the accuracy isn't any better than a round balls accuracy.

The muzzle velocity will be slower with the bullet because of the additional weight

A look at the conical's actually used in the Remington and Colt reveals that they were quite short. Not much longer than the size of the bore. This allowed them to be loaded into the gun without enlarging the clearance cut that is machined into the gun.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top