WOW so IF your reference by way of photograph was deemed a discussion of a modern system it would have been deleted. It was not, but merely a caution was issued to the group, because there are those that see such, and don't understand and think it's ok to simply start talking about the modern rifles, retro engineered to conform to a legal definition of a muzzleloader used for hunting. Which, is not allowed here.
It's your apparent opinion that this forum's distinction is not valid. OK that's fine..., but your opinion doesn't prevail here. Neither does mine, for I was not asked to establish the standard. It was established long before I arrived. My job is just oversight.
You, and any other person on the forum of course are free to start your own forum, and not have the distinction enforced...,
If the distinction here irks you, then you are free of course to "vote with your feet" and depart the group, as we are all free to do so. Nobody's presence here is mandatory.
However, a debate on what is and is not part of a category banned prior to a member's membership, and acceptance of that ban was part of the member ship accepted by the new member, is a defacto discussion of that which is not permitted.
Here endeth the thread.
