I just got this one recently. I don't know how old it is... I would guess early 20th century... but it looks old, and it has a homely, backwoods style that really appeals to me. The blade on this one, handle to tip, is just a smidge over 7.5", and the overall length is about 12.375". Maximum blade width is 1.25".
Here is a full-length view of the obverse side:
There are no maker's marks of any kind on it anywhere, so I believe it is a homemade job. However, the shape of the blade has a very professional look, and the grinding is impeccable. The transitions are imperceptibly smooth, and there are no stray grind marks anyplace on it.
Here is a view of the reverse:
The grind on this side is just as good as the other. I think this blade may have been cut out of an old handsaw. The metal is a very uniform 0.057" thick, which is pretty thin. There is a full tang, which is not tapered but remains full thickness for its total length:
This image gives a better look at the obverse side of the handle:
Those are not cutler's rivets. They are copper harness rivets, roughly size #13. The heads are slightly out of round, and vary from about .340" to .355" in diameter. The rivet heads are very slightly proud of the wood surface. On the opposite side of the handle, you can see the rivet shanks and the one remaining "burr," or washer:
Two of the three burrs have come off and been lost, yet the scales still seem pretty solidly attached. These close-up views of the handle show one other real old-time design feature, which is that the choil is actually behind the leading edge of the handle scales. In other words, the handle overlaps the blade slightly, by about 1/8". I think this helps strengthen a potential weak spot in the blade.
I am pretty sure the scales are of unfinished ash wood, based on the texture, color, and grain pattern. It does appear to be a "white" wood. The scales are approximately 9/32" thick, and right at 4.875" long. These had minimal shaping. Except for that very minimal taper in their overall width, they look like just flat, rectangular slabs, with all of the corners slightly rounded off. However, this old knife feels pretty good in the hand.
So, I seriously doubt this is a fur trade relic. It's just an old knife. The feeling I get from it is that it was probably made by a talented craftsman with limited means. He used what he had... an old saw blade, some spare harness rivets, some scrap wood... but he put all of his skills into play to turn out a neatly designed and very well constructed knife. I would like to think he was an older guy. While the knife itself may not be all that old, the design of the blade tip is very similar to what you would see on early 19th century butcher knives, and the way the wood scales slightly overlap the blade shows a good understanding of knife design and an awareness of older ways of building them. This knife may have never skinned a buffalo or lifted a scalp, but I'll bet it sliced a few loaves of fresh, home-baked bread, maybe carved a Christmas ham, and it just might have skinned a deer, killed with an old muzzle-loading mountain rifle.
Just my ruminations.
Best regards,
Notchy Bob
Here is a full-length view of the obverse side:

There are no maker's marks of any kind on it anywhere, so I believe it is a homemade job. However, the shape of the blade has a very professional look, and the grinding is impeccable. The transitions are imperceptibly smooth, and there are no stray grind marks anyplace on it.
Here is a view of the reverse:

The grind on this side is just as good as the other. I think this blade may have been cut out of an old handsaw. The metal is a very uniform 0.057" thick, which is pretty thin. There is a full tang, which is not tapered but remains full thickness for its total length:

This image gives a better look at the obverse side of the handle:

Those are not cutler's rivets. They are copper harness rivets, roughly size #13. The heads are slightly out of round, and vary from about .340" to .355" in diameter. The rivet heads are very slightly proud of the wood surface. On the opposite side of the handle, you can see the rivet shanks and the one remaining "burr," or washer:

Two of the three burrs have come off and been lost, yet the scales still seem pretty solidly attached. These close-up views of the handle show one other real old-time design feature, which is that the choil is actually behind the leading edge of the handle scales. In other words, the handle overlaps the blade slightly, by about 1/8". I think this helps strengthen a potential weak spot in the blade.
I am pretty sure the scales are of unfinished ash wood, based on the texture, color, and grain pattern. It does appear to be a "white" wood. The scales are approximately 9/32" thick, and right at 4.875" long. These had minimal shaping. Except for that very minimal taper in their overall width, they look like just flat, rectangular slabs, with all of the corners slightly rounded off. However, this old knife feels pretty good in the hand.
So, I seriously doubt this is a fur trade relic. It's just an old knife. The feeling I get from it is that it was probably made by a talented craftsman with limited means. He used what he had... an old saw blade, some spare harness rivets, some scrap wood... but he put all of his skills into play to turn out a neatly designed and very well constructed knife. I would like to think he was an older guy. While the knife itself may not be all that old, the design of the blade tip is very similar to what you would see on early 19th century butcher knives, and the way the wood scales slightly overlap the blade shows a good understanding of knife design and an awareness of older ways of building them. This knife may have never skinned a buffalo or lifted a scalp, but I'll bet it sliced a few loaves of fresh, home-baked bread, maybe carved a Christmas ham, and it just might have skinned a deer, killed with an old muzzle-loading mountain rifle.
Just my ruminations.
Best regards,
Notchy Bob
Last edited: