• This community needs YOUR help today. With being blacklisted from all ad networks like Adsense or should I say AdNOSense due to our pro 2nd Amendment stance and topic of this commmunity we rely 100% on Supporting Memberships to fund our efforts. With the ever increasing fees of everything, we need help. We need more Supporting Members, today. Please invest back into this community. I will ship a few decals too in addition to all the account perks you get.



    Sign up here: https://www.muzzleloadingforum.com/account/upgrades

1840-60 period ignored

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

Joined
Feb 3, 2001
Messages
14,023
Reaction score
222
Location
Cardiff, CA
BillinOregon said:
There are absolutely no grounds for the excuse that this period is without significant history!
All periods have significant history. The question is, does a period (small window) have enough interest for the general public, to justify reenactments?
 

montanawolfer

32 Cal.
Joined
Mar 6, 2007
Messages
26
Reaction score
4
"All periods have significant history. The question is, does a period (small window) have enough interest for the general public, to justify reenactments."


Absolutely. The 1840 to '65 period was active from Minnesota (Sioux) to the Southwest (Apaches), throughout much of California, the war with Mexico, Texas Rangers and Comanches, the gold rushes from California to Colorado to Montana, early buffalo hunting in Eastern Kansas, Indian conflict on the plains (the Gratten Massacre, Bluewater) Border Ruffians, Cracker Cowboys, and etc. All of these would hold interest for the general public, and allow for expanding the public's knowledge outside of the current rendezvous/cowboy eras.

Just a couple of current historical sites that include annual encampments would be Bent's Old Fort (1846) in Colorado, and Fort Union (1851) in North Dakota. All it takes is a group of like-minded men and women who want to explore a new time frame. The inclusion of percussion revolvers and certain breech-loading rifles doesn't hurt, either.
 

Stillwater

32 Cal.
Joined
Aug 20, 2013
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
The book "Crow Killer," was fiction... I wish it were otherwise, but unfortunately, it was fiction through and through.

Although "White eye" Jack Anderson did die in southern California.

Bill
 

Red Owl

50 Cal.
Joined
Jan 26, 2021
Messages
1,014
Reaction score
932
Location
Florida
I agree 100%. I started out many years ago as a "mountain man" with my Hawken rifle and Colt Navy, etc. I then learned a lot wasn't "pre-1840" so I got suckered into the Pre-1840 thing but for many folks, I think they would be better off just portraying a post-1840 Mountain man. Jim Bridger, Kit Carson, Meeks, etc.- just as they were after 1840.
 
Joined
Jul 22, 2021
Messages
1,551
Reaction score
3,156
Around here Hannibal, Missouri, it's all about Mark Twain. Sadly, the only personas around are Tom and Becky. Nobody doing Injun Joe nor "Jim". We have the setting, but no one's started anything. Thought about getting a Sheriff's Posse together, but don't know where to start. Runaway slaves are pretty scarce these days.
 
Joined
Mar 5, 2019
Messages
150
Reaction score
187
Gentlemen,
Personally, I LOVE the 1840-65 period. In that period we had the most interesting guns, clothes and saddles. I would have a hard time (personally) reenacting something that didn't happen where I live. I never understood the SCA portraying knights and their fights in Kentucky, but each to their own.
Most of my people are from Ky, Tenn and Missouri. I reenacted as a Missouri Partisan Ranger and carried 4 pistols on my person and 4 on my horse. I loved that hey-day in the 1990's. But... I am 52 now. Political correctness demonized anything Southern, covid killed the rest of the reenactments. Young people are only interested in using their thumbs...
But for me, the 1850s are perfect. Again, great guns, clothes and saddles and we hadn't lost everything yet. At my age, portraying a guerilla is stretching it (yes, Capt. Anderson had a man that was 62 riding with him, but most were late teens early 20s).
Respectfully,
David
 
Joined
May 15, 2021
Messages
43
Reaction score
65
Location
Wyoming
Strange this was brought up today! I was in working in my shop today and was listening to a tv series I have on dvd playing because I am sick of the radio and it got me kinda thinking about that. It’s called Into The West. It portrays a families’ life from pretty much the fur trade to about 1900 ish. Not the greatest series ever made but is fairly interesting. Alot happened in that period, but it is pretty glazed over or just kinda bullet pointed.
 
Joined
Dec 26, 2020
Messages
1,196
Reaction score
1,761
Location
Arkansas, Boston Mountains
Few folks also do 1812 in the states. At an office in DC I once saw a fancy brass plaque that said, " On this site on November 23, 1872, absolutely nothing of importance occurred."

For many history buffs, that same "nothing of importance occurred" is true for that time period.

Hollywood and the media have so romanticized some parts of our history and ignored others.

A few movies about the original cattle drives, very few about the Mexican War era or 1812.

One movie about Fremont that I recall. Any about Kit Carson? Not many superheros from that era. Davy Crockett was gone in 1836. A few minor Indian uprisings.

People do not realize how critical the 1st Quarter of the 19th Century was. We barely made it. We were literally just fumbling a long trying to figure it all out, a brand new Republic. The Federalist/Republicans infighting and the Louisiana Purchase and subsequent Corps of Discovery, the War of 1812 and of Course the migration to the west and then there is Texas. To me this is the most exciting of times. I agree, with the OP however. My people were in Texas at that time and it was not easy. The Texas Rangers were in a constant state of undeclared war with the Red Man, Ruffian, Bandit and a Hostile Nation to its south all of “US” just trying to hold on.

Interesting times.

RM
 

TNBandit

40 Cal
Joined
Apr 27, 2019
Messages
139
Reaction score
187
Funny you should mention this time period. My current Winter project is bringing back from the dead a Springfield Model 1842 that had the typical shotgun conversion by chopping the stock and the barrel down after the Civil War. Those are extremely easy to find and usually cheap. I've got 160 bucks into this one and mechanically it's in great condition. I've also got a spare Model 1842 lock from Harpers Ferry set aside for a future project and looking for an 1841 "Mississippi" to mess with. It was an interesting time period. Flintlocks were just being phased out and the Model 1842 was considered to be one of the first entirely interchangeable rifles where parts from one would fit another with no fussing around.
 
Joined
Apr 6, 2014
Messages
2,625
Reaction score
5,689
Location
Florida
Kudos to @BillinOregon for bringing this up... Ten years ago!

That 1840-1865 era is probably my favorite period of history on the western frontier. The "classic" Hawken halfstock rifles were a product of the 1850's. Some of the most beloved and most often quoted mountain man references... Ruxton, Garrard, Parkman... date to the mid-1840's. There are plenty of original accounts of beaver trappers in Nebraska, Kansas, and the Rockies and northern plains throughout the forties, fifties, and sixties, even into the seventies. Roosevelt described meeting "mountain men"... hunters and trappers... into the eighties. I think the reason for the last rendezvous in 1840 was a temporary decline in the value of beaver coupled with the surge in construction of trading posts and forts in the far west. The rendezvous was simply obsolete.

It's good to see some interest here.

Best regards,

Notchy Bob
 
Last edited:

Essayons!

36 Cl.
Joined
Dec 1, 2018
Messages
52
Reaction score
24
Gentlemen,
Personally, I LOVE the 1840-65 period. In that period we had the most interesting guns, clothes and saddles. I would have a hard time (personally) reenacting something that didn't happen where I live. I never understood the SCA portraying knights and their fights in Kentucky, but each to their own.
Most of my people are from Ky, Tenn and Missouri. I reenacted as a Missouri Partisan Ranger and carried 4 pistols on my person and 4 on my horse. I loved that hey-day in the 1990's. But... I am 52 now. Political correctness demonized anything Southern, covid killed the rest of the reenactments. Young people are only interested in using their thumbs...
But for me, the 1850s are perfect. Again, great guns, clothes and saddles and we hadn't lost everything yet. At my age, portraying a guerilla is stretching it (yes, Capt. Anderson had a man that was 62 riding with him, but most were late teens early 20s).
Respectfully,
David

I really think the "Era of Expansion" 1820-1844 is the most neglected era for reenactors/living history involving clothing, headwear, footwear US uniforms(some sources)...
 
Joined
Jan 31, 2009
Messages
10,609
Reaction score
3,893
There was an old western on TV yesterday with Fremont, some mountain men and other characters. Forget now what show it was. Maybe Death Valley. Robert Taylor was the host.
Made me think about my Fremont :)
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2021
Messages
1,489
Reaction score
2,265
Location
Trout Country New Zealand
Kudos to @BillinOregon for bringing this up... Ten years ago!

That 1840-1865 era is probably my favorite period of history on the western frontier. The "classic" Hawken halfstock rifles were a product of the 1850's. Some of the most beloved and most often quoted mountain man references... Ruxton, Garrard, Parkman... date to the mid-1840's. There are plenty of original accounts of beaver trappers in Nebraska, Kansas, and the Rockies and northern plains throughout the forties, fifties, and sixties, even into the seventies. Roosevelt described meeting "mountain men"... hunters and trappers... into the eighties. I think the reason for the last rendezvous in 1840 was a temporary decline in the value of beaver coupled with the surge in construction of trading posts and forts in the far west. The rendezvous was simply obsolete.

It's good to see some interest here.

Best regards,

Notchy Bob
Notchy Bob , I believe some the decline in the fur trade and the rendezvous was as you say , but it was considerably enhanced by the development of the silk top hat , much more glamorous and stylish than the beaver one .
 
Top