• This community needs YOUR help today. We rely 100% on Supporting Memberships to fund our efforts. With the ever increasing fees of everything, we need help. We need more Supporting Members, today. Please invest back into this community. I will ship a few decals too in addition to all the account perks you get.



    Sign up here: https://www.muzzleloadingforum.com/account/upgrades
  • Friends, our 2nd Amendment rights are always under attack and the NRA has been a constant for decades in helping fight that fight.

    We have partnered with the NRA to offer you a discount on membership and Muzzleloading Forum gets a small percentage too of each membership, so you are supporting both the NRA and us.

    Use this link to sign up please; https://membership.nra.org/recruiters/join/XR045103

Dragoon cylinder gap

muzzle loading side side shotguns
shop deals on amazon
Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
B

borne2fly

36 Cl.
Joined
Nov 10, 2022
Messages
62
Reaction score
59
Location
CA
Colt 3rd Dragoon (made around 1980) with over 0.010" cylinder gap, Also, that gap is dependent upon exactly where it is measured because the back of the barrel (cone?) face is way out of flat. This was right out of the box.





Had to grind off over 0.005" to clean this up. NOW it's flat.
Pushing the cylinder forward until it butts up to the cone, no light can be seen between the two. NOW they're parallel to each other.

Of course, all this only worsens the endshake. (Fix one problem, create another, etc ...)
So ... next step is to make a shim to fit between the frame and the back of the cylinder. My target is a 0.004" cylinder gap.
When re-attaching the barrel, I typically place a feeler gage between the cylinder and cone as the wedge is driven in (in this case it'll be a 0.004" feeler).
When a drag is felt on the feeler, and if I did all this right, the cone and cylinder should land parallel to each other as they are now.
 
So, if you have to "set" the supposed "gap" by how far the wedge is driven in, then your just setting a temporary "endshake " setting. Your Dragoon doesn't have a bushing to establish a bonifid gap so in the instance of open top revolvers all you have is endshake ( the fore and aft movement of the cylinder).
It is in fact the length of the arbor that is the deciding factor as to how far the barrel assy will be pulled against the end of the arbor when the wedge is installed ( driven in sufficiently to maintain its position).
As you now know, your arbor isn't long enough to be that limiting factor and unfortunately you've added .005" more to the endshake you started with.

The limiting feature of the arbor has been a design element that has not been incorporated in any reproduction open top revolvers since the first reproductions were made ( yes, including the Colt 2nd and 3rd gens). Pietta is the only maker that has remedied this problem but it has only been the last dozen or so years. This known problem has long been called the "short arbor" or " short arbor syndrome" and can totally be corrected by installing a spacer in the arbor hole to take up space and give the arbor a surface to butt up to.

The end result is a repeatable reassembly of the open top revolver that will maintain a designated endshake ( my specs are .0025" - .003") and a sight picture that will also be maintained.

Mike
 
Mike, I'll do that eventually. Either a spacer or set screw tapped into the end of the arbor. So far the feeler seems to set the gap pretty consistently and the wedge appears to hold it all together quite well. I'm guessing the arbor will lose it's light press fit over time, and that's when I'll do what you've done.
And the deeper I go into this thing the rougher it gets .... looks like it was made with hacksaws and files :) I have a lot of deburring and polishing to do.
 
How is the nipple height set? Should the hammer close on the nipple with maybe 1 or 2 thou clearance? Or should it actually hit it? And how does this work with a little bit of endshake? I originally had to put shims under the nipples to get the hammer to fire the caps at all, and that doesn't sound right.
 
borne2fly said:
Mike, I'll do that eventually. Either a spacer or set screw tapped into the end of the arbor. So far the feeler seems to set the gap pretty consistently and the wedge appears to hold it all together quite well. I'm guessing the arbor will lose it's light press fit over time, and that's when I'll do what you've done.
And the deeper I go into this thing the rougher it gets .... looks like it was made with hacksaws and files :) I have a lot of deburring and polishing to do.
Click to expand...

A set screw isn't a good fix for the arbor length. Actually it would be best to make the revolver "solid" before "adjusting" for a permanent setup. You see, every time you shoot that Dragoon, the wedge is pinched and is given the ability to move. Driven in, the wedge will remain in place and a consistent setup will be maintained. Right now, it's a moving target and probably the cylinder would have locked if you drove the wedge all the way in. Take my advice and start at the beginning and build a solid open top rather than a patch job all along the way. Then you won't have to do the "nipple height " thing again.

Mike
 
45D said:
A set screw isn't a good fix for the arbor length. Actually it would be best to make the revolver "solid" before "adjusting" for a permanent setup. You see, every time you shoot that Dragoon, the wedge is pinched and is given the ability to move. Driven in, the wedge will remain in place and a consistent setup will be maintained. Right now, it's a moving target and probably the cylinder would have locked if you drove the wedge all the way in. Take my advice and start at the beginning and build a solid open top rather than a patch job all along the way. Then you won't have to do the "nipple height " thing again.

Mike
Click to expand...
So something like a 1/2” washer set into the arbor hole?
 
Stantheman86 said:
I have a Pietta Navy that was like that, I ran a file across the forcing cone until it "eyeballed" to a nice b/c gap, then I took it out and put 10 cylinders through it. Works great 😀

If it not perfectly "even" I'm really not worried about it
Click to expand...
I thought about doing that too, but this was a good excuse to dig out the tool post grinder. That thing’s been collecting dust for too many years.
 
borne2fly said:
So something like a 1/2” washer set into the arbor hole?
Click to expand...

Something more like this :
20220617_125334.jpg


It's a #14 Pan Head sheet metal screw
with the shaft removed (#12 for belt pistols)
20220617_125619.jpg


Sanded to an appropriate size:
20220617_130418.jpg


Installed (round end in the bottom of the arbor hole).
20220617_142509.jpg


Something like that.

Mike
 
Last edited:
Yeah you should check and fix arbor first. A tapper in the gap is a sign. Hope when you fix the arbor it stays square.
 
I have a spare cylinder on the way and I’m told it probably won’t fit anything this old. Has anyone here tried swapping newer cylinders into pre-2000 guns?
 
Mike,
Pretty slick job on that skeletonized frame. I like it!

BTW, I took your advice on the arbor and made up a plug to drop into the arbor hole. I must admit, it's a lot more convenient than fiddling with the feeler gage.

-Don
 
borne2fly said:
I have a spare cylinder on the way and I’m told it probably won’t fit anything this old. Has anyone here tried swapping newer cylinders into pre-2000 guns?
Click to expand...
Update ... spare cylinder arrived. Uberti. Plugged right into this 1980's Colt. Everything spins and locks as it should. Cylinder gap was different as expected ... I made a new shim to go behind the cylinder and now it's spot on.
So I'm getting the impression that certain parts CAN interchange with only minor work.
 
borne2fly said:
Colt 3rd Dragoon (made around 1980) with over 0.010" cylinder gap, Also, that gap is dependent upon exactly where it is measured because the back of the barrel (cone?) face is way out of flat. This was right out of the box.


View attachment 177473
View attachment 177475

Had to grind off over 0.005" to clean this up. NOW it's flat.
Pushing the cylinder forward until it butts up to the cone, no light can be seen between the two. NOW they're parallel to each other.

Of course, all this only worsens the endshake. (Fix one problem, create another, etc ...)
So ... next step is to make a shim to fit between the frame and the back of the cylinder. My target is a 0.004" cylinder gap.
When re-attaching the barrel, I typically place a feeler gage between the cylinder and cone as the wedge is driven in (in this case it'll be a 0.004" feeler).
When a drag is felt on the feeler, and if I did all this right, the cone and cylinder should land parallel to each other as they are now.
Click to expand...
 
On the 60 I just rebuilt the gap total was .027 and the cylinder face was out of level. The face had to be dressed level to begin with. I had to build a new wedge and trim the lower lug so the key draw up on the arbor was parallel to the lug seat reduction.
I'm wondering if the washer shim at the cylinder base may require a hand stretch on your gun and if it will hold up to recoil. I've not made a gap reduction from the rear as you are doing so am very interested in how it works out. Thanks for sharing.
 
M. De Land said:
On the 60 I just rebuilt the gap total was .027 and the cylinder face was out of level. The face had to be dressed level to begin with. I had to build a new wedge and trim the lower lug so the key draw up on the arbor was parallel to the lug seat reduction.
I'm wondering if the washer shim at the cylinder base may require a hand stretch on your gun and if it will hold up to recoil. I've not made a gap reduction from the rear as you are doing so am very interested in how it works out. Thanks for sharing.
Click to expand...
I haven’t fired it since the rework, but the shim is just a thin steel washer. I imagine it should be fine. My gap wasn’t as large as yours so I didn’t do anything that cut into the frame or barrel other than to lightly surface the cone face. With a gap of .027 I’d probably use a .022 shim behind the cylinder and check that everything spins and locks when it should. And most likely longer nipples would be needed, or alternatively shim washers under those too
 
borne2fly said:
I haven’t fired it since the rework, but the shim is just a thin steel washer. I imagine it should be fine. My gap wasn’t as large as yours so I didn’t do anything that cut into the frame or barrel other than to lightly surface the cone face. With a gap of .027 I’d probably use a .022 shim behind the cylinder and check that everything spins and locks when it should. And most likely longer nipples would be needed, or alternatively shim washers under those too
Click to expand...
I'm curious if the shim stock steel ( which is annealed and soft) will resist the ratchet star imprinting and deforming it from recoil much as a brass frame does with heavy loads!
 
Last edited:
borne2fly said:
Update ... spare cylinder arrived. Uberti. Plugged right into this 1980's Colt. Everything spins and locks as it should. Cylinder gap was different as expected ... I made a new shim to go behind the cylinder and now it's spot on.
So I'm getting the impression that certain parts CAN interchange with only minor work.
Click to expand...


The bearing surface is the "recoil ring" on a cap gun. A shim behind the ratchet isn't a good idea. Got a picture?

Mike
 

Similar threads

M
Double checking the arbor end fit on my 2022 Pietta 51
Replies
2
Views
198
earlwb
E
P
Lengthening forcing cone to reduce cylinder gap, in revolver with integral barrel.
2
Replies
24
Views
914
M. De Land
M
M
average cylinder gaps
Replies
12
Views
707
45D
4
J
1851 Pietta Sheriff’s Model
Replies
0
Views
237
Joemolf
J
Rich44
1860 Colt Hammer Redo
2
Replies
29
Views
1K
M. De Land
M

Latest posts

Back
Top