• This community needs YOUR help today. We rely 100% on Supporting Memberships to fund our efforts. With the ever increasing fees of everything, we need help. We need more Supporting Members, today. Please invest back into this community. I will ship a few decals too in addition to all the account perks you get.



    Sign up here: https://www.muzzleloadingforum.com/account/upgrades
  • Friends, our 2nd Amendment rights are always under attack and the NRA has been a constant for decades in helping fight that fight.

    We have partnered with the NRA to offer you a discount on membership and Muzzleloading Forum gets a small percentage too of each membership, so you are supporting both the NRA and us.

    Use this link to sign up please; https://membership.nra.org/recruiters/join/XR045103

Hawken Rifles, What's All The Hoopla?!

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I don’t have much experience with todays variety of Hawkins . I hear how much folks like the fit and finish of the Pedersoli attempt. As I have experienced I wouldn’t trade my Sharon for anything offered today. I will gift my Sharon to my son. If Kibler does turn out a Hawken I would probably buy it but that’s the only one.
 
I have a matched pair of .54 caliber Sharon fullstocks, one is flint and the other is percussion.
They are both either Sharon built or kit guns, the L&R locks and furniture are testimony to that.
They were built in the Sharon heyday as the greenish ting of the stain alludes to- I do not recall the exact name, chromium trioxide or something.
At first I thought they may have been a father/son project but given the build nuances I am pretty sure they were built by the same set of hands, good inletting and overall build quality is very good.
And I think whoever built them kept a strong eye to historical accuracy.
The flint rifle bears fine, detailed architecture reminiscent of an earlier rifle. Just enough to be a rifle but not sacrificing strength.
The percussion rifle is a bit less refined, a little more…..substantial of a build that would lend itself to a more mass produced, utilitarian rifle.
I don’t think either have ever been fired, they bear no witness to the fact and the bores are mirror bright.
One of these days I will pull the barrels and see if there are any markings in the stocks.
They match well to my factory Sharon halfstock .54 and the unbuilt .54 Trade Rifle kit I have (still in the factory box).
 
All this Hawken talk reminded me I have a another &%%@&!!! project to finish. Thought I was done - but no cause this one remains.
 

Attachments

  • 20180112_141555.jpg
    20180112_141555.jpg
    2.5 MB · Views: 0
That's awesome you have those rifles. As far as I know you have the next best thing to a J &S Hawken bros original! How about posting the pictures for us to see? Thanks for the post. Gil


Appreciate the compliment. While the Sharon rifles were a reasonable doppelgänger for the real deal at their time in the muzzle loading renaissance there are a handful of contemporary builders who produce incredibly accurate Hawken pattern rifles.
Herb (a member here)
D. Taylor Sapergia
WB Selb
Steve Zihn (I really blew it, I had the opportunity to buy a rifle built by him for a fraction of its worth - I passed on it at the time)
Don Stith (we lost him this summer RIP) put out extremely accurate parts sets- in the hands of a good builder they are spot on.
I know I have missed a bunch.
 
Appreciate the compliment. While the Sharon rifles were a reasonable doppelgänger for the real deal at their time in the muzzle loading renaissance there are a handful of contemporary builders who produce incredibly accurate Hawken pattern rifles.
Herb (a member here)
D. Taylor Sapergia
WB Selb
Steve Zihn (I really blew it, I had the opportunity to buy a rifle built by him for a fraction of its worth - I passed on it at the time)
Don Stith (we lost him this summer RIP) put out extremely accurate parts sets- in the hands of a good builder they are spot on.
I know I have missed a bunch.
That's a good list, but we should add Bob Browner. :thumb:

Notchy Bob
 
There are other characters available by using a different four number code:

€ - 0128
‰ - 0137
Π- 0140
™ - 0153 (a favorite of mine on Twitter for use in "ButtHurt™")
® - 0174
¢ - 0162
£ - 0163
¥ - 0165
§ - 0167
± - 0177
² - 0178 for x²
µ - 0181
¶ - 0182 (another favorite of mine to indicate the end of a screed)
¼ - 0188
½ - 0189
¾ - 0190
¿ - 0191 (another favorite of mine for use in the title of a post for the reader to immediate see that it is a question)

HTH

When my daily life becomes so boring that studying the movement of garden Snails begins to interest me, then I'll take up the study all of the above keyboard characters.
 
When I decided I wanted to shoot BP again, I started looking for rifles. This T/C factory Hawken .54 was the first one I found. It looked nice and the price was reasonable, so it rode home with us.
The only features I didn't like are the V notch sites and the the standard "Ya mean ya have to clean these guns?", rusty barrel.
But hey, it purty and it be a Hawken!


54 Hawken.jpg
 
There are other characters available by using a different four number code:

€ - 0128
‰ - 0137
Π- 0140
™ - 0153 (a favorite of mine on Twitter for use in "ButtHurt™")
® - 0174
¢ - 0162
£ - 0163
¥ - 0165
§ - 0167
± - 0177
² - 0178 for x²
µ - 0181
¶ - 0182 (another favorite of mine to indicate the end of a screed)
¼ - 0188
½ - 0189
¾ - 0190
¿ - 0191 (another favorite of mine for use in the title of a post for the reader to immediate see that it is a question)

HTH
What's the code for degrees?
 
When I decided I wanted to shoot BP again, I started looking for rifles. This T/C factory Hawken .54 was the first one I found. It looked nice and the price was reasonable, so it rode home with us.
The only features I didn't like are the V notch sites and the the standard "Ya mean ya have to clean these guns?", rusty barrel.
But hey, it purty and it be a Hawken!


View attachment 175969
That was my very first muzzle loader but in a .50 cal.
 
Not historically correct but I love the look of my Investarms. When people asks what it is, I tell them it’s a Hawken style rifle
I have two , a capper and a flinter and I think they are a very good rendition of a Hawken style. Sometimes people get caught up in the minutia and can't see the forest for the trees. Some times the details are so small that to the average person there is absolutely No difference. To me unless you are building a Hawken from scrap, hammering out the barrrel etc, there are no "originals" just copies of varying degrees.IMHO
 

Latest posts

Back
Top