-
This community needs YOUR help today. We rely 100% on Supporting Memberships to fund our efforts. With the ever increasing fees of everything, we need help. We need more Supporting Members, today. Please invest back into this community. I will ship a few decals too in addition to all the account perks you get.
Sign up here: https://www.muzzleloadingforum.com/account/upgrades -
Friends, our 2nd Amendment rights are always under attack and the NRA has been a constant for decades in helping fight that fight.
We have partnered with the NRA to offer you a discount on membership and Muzzleloading Forum gets a small percentage too of each membership, so you are supporting both the NRA and us.
Use this link to sign up please; https://membership.nra.org/recruiters/join/XR045103
Back Action Rifle
- Thread starter Cajun72
- Start date
Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:
hanshi
Cannon
Those photos show a very fine looking rifle and one that would interest me. I second the Ned Roberts book; It's almost a bible for percussion shooters.
The historian there at the classic put the date on that rifle between 1837-1845, I'm still stittin" on that one.
Ned Robert's book is one of my favorites. I am hoping I can dig up some info on the maker of the rifle. That way I can determine it's age? It's amazing to find an old rifle in such good condition.
The one I have doesn't have as clean as a stock like yours's, it's much darker but you can still see the figure in the wood. It's a .48 caliber and I had to have a mold made because .470 balls are hard to come by. This rifle is a beast, the bore is almost perfect but the thing weights over 12 lbs.
Very nice rifle. I saw another one like your's on the forum but it sold before I could buy it. My rifle was listed as a contemporary rifle. I think it was probably made around the same time as yours give or take. Since mine is a .54 with an 1 1/8 barrel I'm sure it's no light weight. Will give more specs once it arrives.
That one has a 1 1/8 barrel also, your .54 may weight just a bit less due to the additional material removed to make it a .54.
I bought a full stock at the same time as that one much fancier in. .45, the barrel on that one was trashed so Bobby Hoyt has it now and I asked for a .54 if possible, if not a .50.
I bought a full stock at the same time as that one much fancier in. .45, the barrel on that one was trashed so Bobby Hoyt has it now and I asked for a .54 if possible, if not a .50.
Here's a couple of photo's of my ancestors 40 caliber halfstock from the 1840's or so.
And here's my 32 that I built in 1976. That too tall rear sight is a replacement that I've been going to file down but haven't gotten around to it yet.
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2021
- Messages
- 87
- Reaction score
- 130
I'm currently building one as I have always thought they were neat. I am glad to see the lock set back from the patent breech as that is how I had to do mine due to the geometry of the parts available. I haven't decided on trigger/triggers yet. The Wisconsin rifle has just a single trigger and as I am going to use this only for hunting, maybe that is the way I need to go.
There is nothing wrong with a single trigger on a hunting rifle, or on a target rifle for that matter. With the right trigger geometry and some careful polishing it's easy enough to get a good clean trigger pull. Some people don't like a little play in the trigger before the bar comes into contact with the sear but it's something that you get used to pretty fast.
No listing in Sellers book of H Hendrick
Well rifle finally arrived. Overall very nice shape and built well. Weight of 11.30 lbs, definitely a .54 cal. Clean crisp rifling muzzle is not coned. I think I found the builder. Harold H. Hendricks 1923-2006. He enjoyed bp guns and was from Verona Wisconsin. So contemporary maker build from scratch or a rework? There is a percussion flash piece to protect the barrel just forward of the tang
