Original 18th century Virginia Rifle

Stophel said:

I have no idea where this is going now.... British made iron gun mounts in German style imported to America.....

Click to expand...

I am questioning the logic behind the current fad of building guns referred to as "early Virginia" style and having a somewhat defining characteristic be the use of iron furniture. If the commerce laws were such that gunsmiths had to choose between buying and importing iron locks, trigger guards, buttplates, ramrod thimbles, and such, from Britain, or casting them out of brass themselves, I would think they would use brass furniture and an imported lock. The Pennsylvania builders did. And, why would a British manufacturer be making rifle style trigger guards? Meaning having a grip rail, a loop big enough for double set triggers,,, as opposed to the expected British style Fowler or musket trigger guard. Just using the guard as an example.
I think this all just goes to show that the "iron mounted Early Virginia" is pretty far off base.

BN. I think a lot had to do with the materials they had on hand.. some using iron some brass. Back in the day speaking.

As too the current style Virgina guns it does seem as if Builders tend too use mostly steel hardware. I like them both!

In the early 1800's in the Carolina Schools, they used various materials in making guns.. some forged & some poured.

Realizing that these were manufactured long after the period of which we’re speaking... but these Guys were taught this at somewhere along the way.

Here's one of my favorites..

Brokennock said:

I am questioning the logic behind the current fad of building guns referred to as "early Virginia" style and having a somewhat defining characteristic be the use of iron furniture.

Click to expand...

There isn't much logic to it. It's purely wishful thinking. People desperately WANT pre-Revolutionary iron mounted Virginia rifles... so, they make them. Now, there are some iron mounted, presumably Virginia rifles that do exist, probably from the 1780's-90's, but extrapolating this back prior to 1770 is a stretch, I think.

I don’t know much about imported British gun furniture, especially iron mounts. The primary British-styled colonial guns made here were British styled fowling pieces but they were brass mounted. Common practice north and south in the colonial period was to import complete cheap trade guns, mid level fowlers, and militia quality muskets from England. Labor was cheaper there. But we are getting far from the original topic.

We can all reason all we want but all we have for pre-1770 Virginia colonial built rifles are a couple undated, unsigned, reasoned attributions (all with brass mounts). And one of those attributions was very likely wrong. The one on the colonial Williamsburg site listed as a very early Virginia rifle was most likely made by John Newcomer of Lancaster PA.

As Paul Simon wrote back in the day, “Still a man hears what he wants to hear
And disregards the rest.”

All that said, I think some of them look really good. I do like the all-brown look, and they can be quite charming, if made well.

Zonie, were any dates given for the guns listed above? Thanks

smo said:

Zonie, were any dates given for the guns listed above? Thanks

Click to expand...

I seem to recall one or two of them mentioned a possible date but most of them said nothing about it.

Based on the patchboxes I would say that most of the flintlocks were made in the 1780-1820 time frame. Only one of them had a wood patch box cover.

Thanks