• This community needs YOUR help today. We rely 100% on Supporting Memberships to fund our efforts. With the ever increasing fees of everything, we need help. We need more Supporting Members, today. Please invest back into this community. I will ship a few decals too in addition to all the account perks you get.



    Sign up here: https://www.muzzleloadingforum.com/account/upgrades
  • Friends, our 2nd Amendment rights are always under attack and the NRA has been a constant for decades in helping fight that fight.

    We have partnered with the NRA to offer you a discount on membership and Muzzleloading Forum gets a small percentage too of each membership, so you are supporting both the NRA and us.

    Use this link to sign up please; https://membership.nra.org/recruiters/join/XR045103

Unusual repro Richmond high hump lock plate

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Steve Blancard

40 Cal.
Joined
Mar 4, 2007
Messages
272
Reaction score
85
I picked up this built up repro Richmond musket to add to a display I do in the National Park Service. The story is that it was built by Lodgwood for an N-SSA shooter. It's not pretty, but is solid and serviceable. I pulled the lock to clean and inspect it. I was pretty surprised by how pitted the back side of the lock is. Clearly the front has been cleaned and stamped. The back looks quite old and very pitted. I'm under no illusions that this is an original Richmond lock plate. It was suggested that Lodgwood may have made this from a Whitney high hump unfinished lock plate. That seems like a real possibility. What do you guys think?
 

Attachments

  • 20190825_165423.jpg
    20190825_165423.jpg
    71.2 KB · Views: 133
  • 20190825_165249.jpg
    20190825_165249.jpg
    164.3 KB · Views: 140
  • 20190825_163417.jpg
    20190825_163417.jpg
    268.8 KB · Views: 133
Yes, I like it. Kind of surprising to see the inside of the lock plate, not that it's function is compromised, but I have pulled locks off of very old unmentionable Trapdoors that looked brand new inside, but much patina on the outside of the plate.

Well I don't think I know anything about who or why or how anyone made it, but I like "not pretty" rifles like that very much. I'd take something like that hunting, and be proud of it.
 
Looks similar to my Armi-Sport Richmond. I like it so much I may get the Pedersoli (Euroarms) version too.
 

Attachments

  • 20190802_152354.jpg
    20190802_152354.jpg
    180.6 KB · Views: 71
Man, you just can't beat the hammer on the '61, or Richmond, for cool-factor. I debated long and hard whether to get a '61, or an Enfield/P53, but that too cool hammer made the final decision. I have not regretted it.

I think my next dream rifle would be to get another '61, or a Richmond, have it cut down to a 2-band rifle, then send it off and have it re-bored to .62" with round ball rifling.
 
The College Hill website has a good summary of the Whitney High Hump and use of the unfinished lock plates. I'm thinking that this could have been a crusty leftover Whitney plate that someone sent to Lodgwood. They ground the outer face smooth and stamped it as CS Richmond. Funny thing is, these Whitney lockplates are probably rarer than a Richmond.

https://collegehillarsenal.com/Whitney-High-Hump-M185561-Variant-Rifle-Musket-Very-Rare
 
Back
Top